Speaker polyamory -- or, stories about getting a second set to alternate with your primary

My main system resides in a medium sized bedroom dedicated to it. Currently I have two speaker pairs which I switch out, Tannoy Sterlings and Esoteric MG-10s. I will likely move the Sterlings into a living room system and replace with something else. Would like to try Maggie LRS+ as I have never had a pair of Maggies. At some point I will likely be looking to replace the MG-10s with another 2-way stand mount. 

One issue with trying out different speakers is amplifier requirement for then can vary greatly.  I use a Aric Audio Transcend tube amp with the Sterlings and a Pass XA25 with the 10s. I feel I would need a more powerful amp for the Maggies. I would also like to try out a used pair of Joseph Audio Pulsars, also needing more power than the XA25 provided I believe. 

There are many on this forum that have been in this hobby for many years and have had access to many systems and therefor have a focused idea of the presentation they prefer. This can lead to refinement towards a single goal (system).  In my case I have been involved in audio for over 50 years however with rather limited access to diverse systems. This leads me towards exploration, which I enjoy. I guess my time has finally come.

@mesch  Nice to hear from you. I'm also curious about the LRS speakers. I've heard the XA25 has much more power than officially claimed. 

Also glad to hear from the motorcycle folks and others with multiple forms of hobby gear. I love music, but I love gear, too. I love the technology and the variation it can bring to experiences of music. There is no such thing as an Ur-presentation of food, wine, transportation, etc. I'm amazed people can settle on a single divinity. The polytheistic ancient Greeks and the Hindus keep things fresh, IMO.

I'm with manogolf. I have a pair of Daedalus DA 1.1and GR Research X-Statics for floor standers. and monitors that I swap out frequently. A pair of REL subs that are sometimes needed and sometimes not. My current monitors are T+A Criterions.. I love to rotate the stock and listen to what each brings to the table.

I have stayed with box speakers which I have as floor standers for serious listening and bookshelfs for more casual locations.

Over the years, I have been intrigued by both planars and horns for their reputedly better performance in certain aspects.  But I didn't go with the planars because of their size, volume restrictions, and bass output.  And I didn't choose horns because of their size, WAF impact, and high frequency extension.  I recognize these concerns are mainly my personal prejudice, and I could be wrong about performance issues.

I wish I had had more time and money to actually explore these.

I can't afford a mistress. It was bad enough when I had a pair laying around but to be torn between two speakers, feeling like a fool,....

All the best,
Nonoise