What does Q mean in speaker specifications?


I have never seen that listed before on any speaker. Can you explain what the Q means on these Falcon speakers? THX

 

 

Falcon Acoustics is pleased to announce the re-introduction of the Falcon Acoustics Q7 “Complete@Home” Loudspeaker system. Designed by Malcolm Jones and sold by Falcon for many years, the updated Q7 features the same Falcon B110 and T27 drive units as used in the Falcon LS3/5a in a specially extended LS3/5a-type cabinet to produce an optimum Q=0.7 system with extra bass compared to the LSA3/5a (+2dB @ 50 Hz). Factory built options supplied built by Falcon, fully checked and tested are available.

128x128yogiboy

Here is simple/nutshell info on such from a speaker manufacturer.

Having used various vintage single driver speakers, mated with various tube/SS amps, for the past 20 years (as well as different enclosures - including open baffle) I do pay attention to the combined QTS measurements (and/or guessed values based upon listening/experimentation) of the drivers I've owned/used/consider'd.

Damping factor (low values) of the amps I've used/use is also a consideration.

 

DeKay

erik_squires is correct. The original LS3/5a had a Q of 1.2 which produced a bump in the mid bass. This was done to balance the bass to the rest of the sound spectrum since a flat speaker sounds lean if it's bass resonance is high like the LS3/5a. But the price of a high Q to balance the sound is increased overhang in the bass roll off and thus decreased definition in the bass.

Dyna:

Do you have documentation for the 1.2 "Q" measurement?

Having owned Rogers Ls3/5a's for 1979-1986 I find that spec hard to comprehend (considering the cabinet size).

Yes, they did had a mid-bass hump - making them difficult to properly mate with subs (including their non-sub AB1's which I also used).

DeKay

 

The system Q of driver & cabinet has been used as an essential guide to a speaker's bass quality since the seminal work in modeling bass alignments using filter theory was done in the late 50s-early 70s by several people.  The parameters identified are typically called the Thiele/Small parameters,  Q itself is unitless and represents the damping factor (tendency to return to rest).  There are several Q values (speaker electrical, speaker mechanical, box) in modeling a driver & enclosure, but speaker makers (as opposed to driver makers) will typically only use the Qtc of the bottom end, which includes the speaker and enclosure.

In general, a Q of .5 is critically damped, with no resonance & ideal transient response.  A Q of .707 is considered maximally flat, with a 3 db rise at the system resonance.  Higher Q values result in progressively more boost & poorer transient response.  Note that I'm only talking about closed boxes here.  All I can tell you about bass reflex is that transient response is always worse and the roll-off below resonance is 24 db/octave vs 12 for closed boxes.  And don't get me started on those port plugs!

This is the measured response of the LS3/5A, according to Hi-Fi World.  As speakers go, it doesn't look bad at all.  The bass alignment can be seen in the steady climb to the left below 300 hz & peaking around 100.

speakerqtc1

This is all great information. You learn something new everyday. @yogiboy are you planning to order the Q7s?