Purifi v Gan amps?

It's all about the implementation, and all the other parts used.  Click on the dropdowns here and see how you can tailor Purifi sound.

https://vtvamplifier.com/product/vtv-amplifier-stereo-purifi-audio-1et400a-amplifier/

So if you ant Purifi amps to have a sound you you use an op amp buffer with a sound?

Why not just use an op amp based amplifier like a LM 3886 and avoid the cost of the Purifi module?If you need more power just parallel multiples of them.

Although from what I have heard Purifi amps do have a sound and it is characterised by by sounding veryclear and detailed but also quite flat/2D and having very poor timing and musical communication.

Although from what I have heard Purifi amps do have a sound and it is characterised by by sounding veryclear and detailed but also quite flat/2D and having very poor timing and musical communication.

Heard from where?  I heard the world was flat — don’t make it true.  Read the Soundstage review. 

I had one on loan for a while.So from what I have heard is literally from what I have heard.It was a March Audio with no aftermarket op amp buffer.Tried it with a few different preamps and digital direct and a few of my speakers and could not get it a complete sound out of it.It is good in some areas like detail but poor in others like imaging and has poor timing so there is no flow or expression to the music.

@mazian 

Unfortunately, you are going to have to listen for yourself. No one can honestly compare two (really) Technolgies.  Within each one of them, the differences are going to be all over the place. @ricevs is right.  Pick two within your budget (one of each) and see which one pleases you the most.  That might point you to one direction or another.  Implementation is going to be a big factor.  You might have to read a lot of reviews to get an idea which flavor is more to your liking.  I had the same conundrums and ended with a GaN one.  Still happy with my choice.