Some good information here. Benefitting from the more informational posts, despite some lamentable trolling. Appreciate Amir getting into the back and forth.
Good read: why comparing specifications is pointless
|
- ...
- 131 posts total
I perform 2-channel testing because a) a lot of people want to use their AV products for music also and b) I use 2-channel systems as the standard that the AV industry needs to strive to match. This is completely wrong. You perform only 2 channel testing because you are forced to, you only have 2 speakers, LOL. I am not being critical of your ability to use a laptop and a mic. The fact that Denon’s own measurements matches yours is good The issue I am bringing to your attention is obvious, you have to review it under the conditions it is designed to be used. You can’t do that with just 2 speakers, OK? I think you have to do both 2 channel testing as well as MCH. You know how many people that buy that receiver that will use it strictly in 2 channel? 0 Do you know how much value a half baked (you didn’t actually ever use the receiver as a customer would when you reviewed it) provides? 0.
|
Well, you tell me. Here is the conclusion of the Denon AVR-X3800H Review: Conclusions You think this is something they would pay for? I would think not. I have an informal agreement with D&M to run my measurements by them in advance of a review. It is an exception to the rule of testing membership products. I am not sure of their reaction to the latest review so maybe they break the relationship for the future, I don't know. What I do know is that the few of you keep shooting from the hip trying to sow discord. :( |
- 131 posts total