It’s painfully obvious to me that people, at one time, got to live in a world where the simple act of turning on the radio, or going to any movie theater, yielded a far greater likelihood of experiencing something good than the people of today experience doing the same stuff.
Money. That’ll do it.
Whether it’s,
A) some particular thing (Auto-Tune, comic book movies) showing corporate executives an opportunity for massive profits, thusly causing said corporations to exploit that thing ad nauseam to the great detriment of prioritizing new/innovative/challenging ideas, or
B) a new/innovative/challenging idea that was funded ultimately yielding significant financial losses for a corporation, thusly causing corporations (the gatekeepers of the masses’ exposure to exciting popular art) to cease any further funding of new/innovative/challenging ideas and thusly reinforcing the purely-commercial motivations described in point A).
I’m fully aware that, in terms of popular music, there were inherent flaws in the system as far as artists were concerned in the past, and that, while streaming provides paltry remuneration for artists today, we are witnessing what may be a very positive change in how artists may gain exposure and commercial viability.
Nonetheless, a gross saturation of incredibly derivative and formulaic work is what defines mainstream popular music and film today, and I think it is obvious that this is of greater dominance in aggregate than ever before.
None of this means that there aren’t awesome artists out there representing the antithesis of everything stated above, merely that “rising to the top” seems to be harder than ever before.