Bypassing Caps - what is it really about?

Larger capacitors tend to have higher inductance and dielectric absorption affecting higher frequencies the most.  Bypassing with smaller capacitor (creating alternative path at high frequency) improves overall performance.  It also allows to use cheaper main capacitor for cost reduction.  Huge electrolytic caps (with higher inductance)  in power supply seems to be ideal target for bypassing (speaker current closes thru them), but low ESR bypassing caps in parallel with inductance of main caps can create parallel resonant circuit.  Using many filter capacitors in parallel reduces overall inductance.  There are better, lower inductance "Slit Foil"  BHC (now KEMET) electrolytic caps, but they only go to about 80V and are expensive. 

noromance has it more or less. Bypassing caps has it's basis in good EE design, especially older but also best bang for the buck designs. 

Think of actual caps as a series of parts:

--> Capacitor --> Inductor --> Resistor ---> 

As the frequency goes up the cap no longer acts like a perfect cap and the inductance becomes a problem.  By bypassing this with the appropriate values of smaller, higher quality caps you can get maximum value for your money.  Imagine a situation when you need 100uF.  The cheapest option may be an electrolytic but may become inductive too soon.  So you buy a 100uF and bypass it with something pricier (per uF) but smaller, like a 2uF film or tantalum cap to overcome the internal inductance. 

The reality of audio gear however is complicated.  Sometimes a good bypass cap can help, sometimes it does nothing.  I like Clarity CMR caps a great deal, but at values larger than 4uF or so they do audibly benefit from a small bypass cap.  Below this value I've not found a bypass cap to help at all.  

I suggest you get a pair of Audyn TruCopper 0.1 uF film caps and experiment for yourself.  The argument of the value of bypassing or not is not ever going to be solved in an online forum. :) 

This is why JBL uses them. See below: page 3 see section High Resolution Dividing Network. 

Mike

https://www.lansingheritage.org/html/jbl/catalogs/1982-home.htm

Bypass capacitors in crossover circuits are, in my opinion, useless. The reason bypass capacitors are used is to lower the overall impedance at frequencies where the equivalent inductance of capacitors has the dominant impedance, which is above the resonant frequency of the capacitor’s inherent RLC. That frequency is way above the audio range.

If you take, say, an exact 10uF crossover cap and bypass it with an exact 0.5uF cap, all you have is one 10.5uF cap. However, if that 10uF cap has a tolerance of 5%, then it can have a 10.5uf capacitance on the high side. Which is exactly the same thing as the 10 plus 0.5 cap in parallel. So I don’t see what benefit piggybacking a cap does to a crossover.

In power supply circuits, the RFI can easily exceed the resonance of the filter caps. That is why bypass caps are used, to lower the overall impedance at those frequencies to shunt the noise to ground.

Thanks for the answers! I would not have intuitively thought about this because the caps I’ve used (Audio Note, VCap, Jupiter, etc) all seem to have fantastic high frequency sound, even if their ESR measures this way or that. (I kind of wonder what kind of person uses VCap teflon or Deuland silver and still doesn't hear enough high frequencies detail) 

I do have a 350uF industrial filter cap on the preamp plate, and that seems like a target for bypassing to experiment with.

Also, from reading articles from various "tone" guys. they seem to bypass based more on blending the sound of their caps. For example I’ve blended electrolytics on each wave of the rectifier, it seems strange each get a different brand of cap, but it did "split the difference" in sound...one Elna was too noisy, the other Kaisei was too intense.