"It doesn’t matter. The concept is the same: higher prices = better fidelity = audio nirvana."
I agree. My point is there are far more ludicrous claims that would have been a much better example.
You know when you are dealing with a BS company....
...when you read statements like this:
"You can expect a 15% to 20% improvement in sound for each level as you move up the line. The improvements are in soundstage, resolution, realism, musical presentation, impact, etc."
Me: yeah, the humidity in my room changed from 44 to 45% yesterday, and I immidiately noticed that the realism dropped by 3.4%, yet the musical presentation actually WENT UP by 8.3%. I was able to compensate by turning the lights on in the kitchen and changed my socks. Puh, that was close.
I am sure there a LOTS of similar examples out there for marketing that promises "15% increase in happiness" for your dollars. And that is dumb enough. But making quantitive statements about non measurable for a technical product is pretty bad. The WORST: the level of dumbness of American consumers (even for technical products) has reached a historic high (I present as proof the number of posters here that have not even recognized the nuttiness of the given example ad). THAT IS SCARY. |
So if they have 5-6 different cables the dearest is going to be 100% better than the cheapest. |