For the first time...
...my digital rig is besting my analog rig in terms of sonic presence and projection. This has never happened before as I've always been more focused on my analog side, letting the Oppo 105 do its thing. However, with some recent additions and changes, my digital side sounds much better and I'm uncomfortable with that.
Analog:
Digital
Amplifier
Speakers
I think the Gungnir was the game changer as it added a sonic presence and clarity missing before. I find my analog reproduction seems to strain more to achieve much the same signature and I don't want to jump back on the upgrade train in order to achieve parity. Blah.
mijostyn said And there folks is the problem. Simao is not an LP collector. In order for LPs to sound better than digital you have to be an LP collector with at least 2000 LPs. What a ridiculous statement. I have 400 records. I probably listen to about 100 of them on a regular basis. I couldn’t possibly play anymore. I played at least two hours a day every day of the week. I’m retired. it will take 92 years to play 2000 records at two hours a day. Bent |
@michaellent I assume he was being dry, tho sarcasm is hard to pick up online. You bring up a good point about the sheer number of hours needed to listen. I'm not one to hold on to records or books or media I no longer listen to or read. @mijostyn Great question. The Clearaudio is most similar to the projection of digital, but the Hana is more accurate and resolving. @mulveling Yes, when I had a Hagerman previously, I rolled the tubes based on recommendations from Brent Jessee. I'll do the same and take your advice, too. Oddly enough, I loaned out the Hagerman to a friend and slotted in an unused Schiit Mani phonostage and I swear the sound is, well, more digital and wide open. Sheesh. |
@grislybutter , Then I guess I am not a serious analog lover. |
@mijostyn I am sure you are close enough :) |
