streaming and audiophile stereo

@tonywinga When I say "bits is bits,"  I mean that while the information is in the digital domain, it is the same regardless of the platform it is on.  So whether the digital data is on a laptop PC, Raspberry Pi or exotic streamer, it's still just digital data.

The secret sauce is always in the D/A conversion.  I have no doubt that there are benefits to newer technologies and there may be audible differences.  But I think that by now, it's all pretty good.  Certainly some pricey designs will be priced far higher than they should, but that's marketing and let the buyer beware.

One of the biggest problems for manufacturers is that they not only compete with each other (and China), they also compete with their own gear on the used market. PS Audio made a big deal out of the DirectStream DAC as the work was not done in firmware, as virtually all other DAC devices do, but was done in an EEPROM and that they would update the software from time to time.  This was supposed to make it future proof.  And of course they have superceded the DirectStream with something new.

I think there is far more to be concerned about in the recording label and who does the mastering.  You can only playback what someone else has mastered.  Because the very vast majority of music listening is done on earbuds, recording engineers are mastering the music for the best sound you can get on earbuds.  This is why you hear about people saying that digital recordings have less dynamic range than vinyl, which is a totally silly statement.  It's in the mastering.

I think it's great when people have the money to drop on expensive gear, but the most bang for your buck will always be in loudspeakers, so that's where I feel your most bucks should go.  My Peachtree DAC does a decent job.  I'm sure there are things out there that would perform better, but at what price?

@russbutton

You are correct that bits a bits. File transfer protocols will assure you that a file in one place is exactly that, bit for a bit,  the same as in an another location. Also, the DAC is a very important component of your system. However, it is also true that the streamer is just as important as the deck, or any other component.

I have extensive experience with, for instance, a MacBook Pro, running on batteries, optimize for streaming, the Aurender,, and 100, the Aurender, and 10, and the Aurender W20SE, all using the same excellent quality DAC. Each in sequence sounds very significantly better than the previous one. This is true either through USB connection or through other digital connections. There are a number of reasons for this, including noise suppression, isolation, and I’m sure many others. But they sound very different, and the better the streamer, the better the sound..

Bits are bits by design when transmitted on a computer network, but it’s when the digital data hits the DAC where things become interesting in regards to sound quality.

There the bits undergo conversion to analogue. That’s where noise and jitter can come into play.

With the technology available 10 years ago that was more of a problem practically in many cases. These days, not so much with most good quality dacs. The technology has matured to the point that it should not be an issue anymore  in most cases with most any decent quality dac.

Speakers, power, Cables, ETHERNET Cable.

Huge! I went from a bluesound node to an Esoteric network streamer and I’m here to tell you that they don’t even compare. Don’t skimp on a good streamer. Lumin, Esoteric, but if your budget really can’t handle that, a node with at least a linear power supply upgrade. I was in that camp for many years until I took the plunge.