You've got issues, buddy
- ...
- 158 posts total
@stager See ya. The fact that you referred to Ebonics - a term that hasn’t been used in 20 years - further shows how out of touch you are. Btw, I believe "nitwit" is a more ad hominem attack than anything I said. I also think it’s not used by anyone except the elf in Rudolph. Anyhow, enjoy being an insecure little bigot, but try to stay in your narrow lane if you can. |
ad ho·mi·nem (ˈ)ad-ˈhä-mə-ˌnem. -nəm. : appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect. an ad hominem argument. : marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made - “Bet you never even heard of Tatum or Bird.” - An ad hominem attack on this user’s level of musical knowledge (saying they probably don’t know about Tatum or Parker) with no evidence to base this ad hominem attack on, doing absolutely nothing to disprove any of this person’s claims with actual facts or actual intellectual argument-making, doing nothing to actually address the subject If avoiding flagrant, egregious hypocrisy is at all a concern for you, it is best to avoid accusing someone of something you literally just did in a big, big way.
|
As usual, if my opinion differs from yours your feelings are hurt. I don't post alot because, mostly I read. If my opinion rubs you the wrong way, sorry to hear that. I did not call out and insult any individuals any individuals on this site. Are you going to insult Ray Charles as well? I've been a Ray Charles fan since I was young. I'm sure I don't agree with everything he has to say. I do agree with his statement. Sorry again if this sounds sparky. You can always get the moderator after me. If they agree with you, my time here will be short lived for sure. |
- 158 posts total