@gs5556 YES!
@nonoise Sounds much like Kenjit doesn't this poster.
@jasonbourne71 Your history does omit some important facts. Monster 300 (the original, not further Mark versions or Monster 400s) was simple in design and well executed. For some reason, the future cable designer/manufacturer (I forgot his name & company) was entrusted with Monster's first interconnect. It is a success over the typical really cheap and common RCA ICs at the time. It has a bloomy and full bottom end, mostly neutral mid and rolled off highs, very pleasant, not highly resolving, but at the time, it was a step in the right direction for improving audio sound.
So, don't tell me it's a bunch of baloney. Sure, I've heard excretable, extremely expensive high cost/end cabling but I also have heard bad/cheap Pangea power and IC cabling in even high end systems where the owner typically was an electrical engineer and until shown the value of a quality higher end cable, said cabling doesn't matter (usually just power cabling).