Home network Fibre optic vs Ethernet


Hello, 

I have the opportunity to re-wire my home including network. 
 

I’m after any advice on fibre optic vs Ethernet, lessons learned, costs, anything you have. 
 

I have 3 rooms to do. TV room, music, and home office/ garden room.

Thanks

mpoll1

Fiber is fragile, does not like bends, requires skill and equipment to terminate and test,  and is expensive.  We used it in large data centers for Gig-E and higher. Also handy in very noisy, and I mean VERY noisy environments.  We use it for security reasons as you can't inductively tap it. If running fiber, then you have the added expense and failure modes of fiber to copper transceivers. Fiber transmitters and receivers are more failure prone than copper.  Do not forget all fiber is not the same. Multi-mode or single mode? For the specific layer one, how many fibers? Which connectors? Oh, yea, we had more issues with errors from the transceivers than the actual runs. 

But for a house? Cat-5. Cat-6 is actually an advertising made up term. 5+ is the same bandwidth but as the pairs are bonded, over long runs ( hundreds of feet) they have a more consistent impedance for Gig-E. Shielded cable is also only useful for long runs in terrible environments or where required for medical certification.  

I know there is a lot of talk about errors and noise, "audio" switches etc. But if running Ethernet, you are running TCP/IP which will with the protocol resend the packets until they all get the correct check sums and then deliver them in sequence.  Any bit drop or noise goes away in the first three layers of the stack. 

IF you have ground loop issues and you have not applied sufficient black magic to fix them, and if you can identify your network in a small domain like a house, then opto-isolators can help.  We used them on buss and tag lines back when IBM demanded their CPU to be on a different lines branch from third party.  Probably irrelevant in a house. 

Your money of course. Don't let audiophile rumor re-posters or armchair "seams reasonable" pontificators who spending your money overshadow reality. Just because something exists does not mean you need it.   I am not an expert, but I did have a career in industry and Government in failure analysis, R/W engineering, data systems architecture, SA and SE  in life-threat reliability systems so I know a little.  I have polished my share of fiber. :)

When I had this situation, for future use, I ran some flexible nonmetallic conduit since there were some tight turns.  I ran some string through it to give me something to pull with when needed.

@tvrgeek For data transmission in a home I’m pretty sure you are right that shielding doesn’t matter. My concern is that since these wires are around analog systems shielding Ethernet cable should reduce the chance that any noise transmitted from Ethernet to nearby analog interconnects or AC wires and supplies.

Phonograph connections and preamps are especially vulnerable.

It's like Wireless does not exist. Get a good wireless mesh network and stop listening to the worries of people concerned about the metal in their power plugs. Unless you have $1M system do you think your Ethernet connection is the biggest issue you got? Even if you have a $1M system I doubt it is.

 

@tvrgeek has his head on straight.  Ethernet is not going to make a ground loop unless you use a shielded cable which is what the audio paranoid are most likely to tell you to do. 

Tv Greek could not be more wrong. My home and our entires subdivision is fiber.

Fiber is fragile, does not like bends, requires skill and equipment to terminate and test,  and is expensive