Audiophilia: Is it the pursuit of audio excellence or just a desire to tinker.


So my wife made this observation after I spent a couple hours fiddle farting with cables, connections and speaker placements. She said is this hobby/obsession your desire for audio excellence, or just you like tinkering with stuff, tweaking your system and feeding your OCD? 

She said you try this and try that and guess what it all sound the same to me. She really knows me and my OCD. 

Enjoy your Sunday.  

jacobsdad2000
Most audiophiles tinker WITHOUT a method ...
 
And a method suppose a set of priorities ...
 
Then their quest for best sound is impeded by ignorance and the tentations offered daily by market conditioning with premature and often unnecessary upgrades erroneously presented as THE solution ...I commit this sin by omission for a decade myself ...😁
 
Upgrades are not solution EVER, save if it is done because the components are not synergetical to begin with ; upgrades done BEFORE understanding what priorities matter in audio when the components purchase has ended with a relatively synergetical system at first listen , upgrades done BEFORE understanding how to embed rightfully the three working dimensions of any system at any price , electrically, mechanically and especially acoustically , Upgrades done BEFORE this understanding are meaningless and costly and deceiving most of the times ... To justify it , people called that their "tastes"... There is no RULING taste concept in acoustic ...It is a marketing trick ...
 
Then instead of tinkering randomlessly we must read basic acoustics and think about the way to decrease the vibration /resonance level , the ways to decrease the signal/noise ratio and shielding about EMI etc ...
 
Study, experiment and dont buy BEFORE understanding what you had done right or wrong with a basically synergetical not too costly system first ...
 
Psycho-acoustics science regulate the gear and the correlated audio experience minimum acoustic satisfaction levels and the optimal one ... Learn some basic ... Forget reviewers speaking about upgrade when you had already a basic system ......
 
Objectivist as subjectivist are dead wrong because they focus on gear pieces , be it with objective measures or subjective branded name products with higher price tag dont matter ... We must focus on acoustics science and no it is not merely about room acoustic panels here but about the scientific concepts and experiments proposed in acoustic basic ..
Vibrations will affect your experience ans signals noise ratio too at any price anyway ...
 
It is better to be creative and being the source of our own happiness in audiophile experience then being a passive compulsive customer hypnotized by price tag and perpetually frustrated ...
 
Take one experiment and one problem at a time and had fun without purchasing anything ... Dont buy costly tweaks replicate them in your own way ...
 
Pick the only method : Electrical, mechanical and acoustical controls experiments ... What i call " embeddings" to be understood...
Guess why objectivist as subjectivist put times to times a "tin foil hat" on me ?
 
😁😊
 
When you are done as i am right now, the time to upgrade if you want too is there , now you will know why, how and with what as i do ...
 
But my low cost system is so good i dont bother with the nerxt meaningful upgrade which can only be a BACCH filters system coupled with a better dac ... I will stay headphone based with it because my low cost speakers are so satisfying right now that even if they can be upgraded easily i am not tempted to do it ... As you see i know exactly what to do next ... I learned it in evaluating acoustic factors in the audio experience by the way i learned how to control them to some degree , and the improvement of the S.Q. ratio with price ...
 
 By the way "excellence in sound"  exist at all price levels in the limits prescribed by the design potential of each component and his right or wrong  embeddings and synergy with the other components in some environment .. ...

Is it either/or or both/and?

Very good question indeed ...

 

--Without a method it is very often an OCD motivated oscillation between the research of good sound and the fun of tinkering and the appeal to false solutions (costly cables ) or premature or badly oriented upgrades ......

 

--With a method the tinkering begun to be organized and end with the chosen components ,which cost the owner is able to afford, when the minimal acoustical satisfaction threshold is reached and all working dimensions are under relative control ...

 

 

An upgrade on a completely new level is possible then but not sometimes seen as necessary because system well embedded punch higher than we think ...

When we are immersed ( and immersive is an acoustic concept with a specific content ) in the soundfield we dont think upgrade even if it is always possible to go higher ... ( minimal acoustic satisfaction threshold is not a stopgap at all by the way because  between each component working optimally there is a coherence between each acoustic factors in quality that is impossible in non well embedded system this is optimal synergy  for some  design quality level  )

Just my 2 cents and own experience ...

 
 

 

 

Post removed