What is meant exactly by the description 'more musical'?

Now another misreading of my intentention and post to put me as a mere customer of atmasphere and promoter of his publicity...

Speaking of senile, I guess you forgot your own post.

"More musical" means an upgrade of gear or /and upgrade of room acoustics...

If you own atmasphere top amplifier for example which is designed in account of some psychoacoustics facts, then you may try to upgrade instead of his already TOP amplifier a low cost speakers to a better one ,

You acted as a troll in this thread willing to be one or not... And you put nowhere a single argument against atmasphere claim or against mine......

So I am a troll because I asked you for your definition of "more musical" and until very recently you couldn't do anything but concoct meaningless word-jumbo?  I asked Atmasphere what his definition of "more musical" was and he actually provided one without quoting a ton of meaningless bullsh!t.  I have no argument with that, except that I believe that one's choice of speakers and that the amp in front of those speakers will have an effect on how well it reproduces a certain genre of music.

I said multiple times that "musical" refer not to words as when you try to use the Webster Merriam dictionary to contradict me

In truth, contradicting you is way easier than going to Mirriam Webster.

You are not ashame to appear "empty" as a senile patient repeating "what means more musical" without end and repeating that we do not say nothing even when i refer to many acoustics concepts and many possible experiments.... At the end of this discussion as the troll you are you spew the truth : you dont mind and you dont care , your system room is musical for you thats enough...

I remember quite a while ago, someone compared you and your rants to a character in "One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest."  At the time, that was another post that made me laugh and I gave the poster of that one a "+100" and as I recall, you reacted badly to that as well.  Seriously though, what you have in common with an institutionalized mental patient is that you exist in a world of your own making that is contradicted by reality.  I was not the OP who asked the question: "what is meant by more musical" and until quite recently you couldn't even come close to providing an answer.  I had to continually tell you that your answers were nonsensical and to try again.  Hopefully the exercise was therapeutic for you.  It was a waste of my time because I am already happy with the musicality of my system.  I can sit back and enjoy what it reproduces.

Effectively here you shine at your best : insulting...

Are you familiar with that old saying about those who live in glass houses?  Or the put calling the kettle black?

Do you get it ?

 But some  people read this thread to LEARN ...They will appreciate...

Hey, I appreciate!  Reading your stuff can be extremely entertaining.  You have made me laugh more than once today!  Keep up the good work!

I have two tube amps, a Reisong A10 SET that puts out 6 watts a side and a Muzishare X7 push/pull which does 35 or 45 a side depending on the mode. Both will play to uncomfortable levels with efficient speakers if desired. What is an average metal head anyway? I don’t think one exists! :) All I know is I like it loud when the party is going but otherwise I sit and enjoy my music at reasonable levels.

Sorry about the average metal head comment.  I was going by the guys I hung with back in my head banging days and the metal guys who post here.  Not that there are many of them, but the posts that I have read from the ones that do do not seem to be interested in tubes.  As I remember, they were all talking about lots of SS stuff.  I prefer the sound of tubes my self, and I am currently listening to a Cary with a six EL34s per side.  It is switchable between 50 wpc of push-pull triode and 100 wpc of ultralinear.  I almost cannot remember the last time I had it in ultralinear, but my tastes have changed a lot since then.  It is not the only tube amp I have ever owned, and I am not sure it is the best sounding (but it's at least close) as prior to it I had a pair of ARC VTM120s that were serious rockers or could whisper sweet and quiet.  But their reliability (or lack thereof)  was a factor, and I used to cross my fingers and grit my teeth when I flipped the switches and I kept a soldering iron close by.  I still have my very first tube amp, a sweet little Cary SLA 70.  It was sweet but the sound was not as "big" and it was not as dynamic.  However, coupled with the right preamp, I would have described it as "musical."  "Harmonious and enjoyable to listen to." 

With all that last typed, and back to your SET, from all that I have read up until today low wpc SET would not be my choice if I liked meal and I liked it loud.  I am not saying that I do not believe you or Atmasphere, but I guess before I was convinced, I'd have to hear it for myself.  Which is one of those many things that probably will not happen in this life time.

So I am a troll because I asked you for your definition of "more musical" and until very recently you couldn’t do anything but concoct meaningless word-jumbo?

I said that you act AS one .. Repeating the same question already answered from the beginning by atmasphere and me ...You even just in a post above say that atmasphere made sense from the beginning .. Then you WERE WRONG ....

And the video i posted are not mumbo jumbo ...But from real acousticians with a doctorate in acoustics ..

I believe that one’s choice of speakers and that the amp in front of those speakers will have an effect on how well it reproduces a certain genre of music

Now repeating a common place fact seems all you know and want to learn about what is "musical"...

Put speakers and a good amp thats all ..

Are you serious?

Anybody saying anything about psychoacoustics or room acoustics is a quack ... Even Edgar Choueiri ?

Your post dont need really an answer because it is mainly many insults for me no more mere misrereading , now that you recognize FINALLY without even saying it explicitly, that atmasphere argument about psychoacoustics use of second order harmonic distortion is useful, and that psychoacoustics define "musical" not taste as said atmasphere in the beginning any other psychoacoustics facts by Dr, Choeuri about crosstalk in stereo system or anything about immersiveness by dr. Hans Gierlich is only babble talk for you ...

you are pathetic ....you laughed but not me...I dont laugh at people by the way...

Enjoy your "musical" system because it seens only you know what is "musical" , you say it very clearly, you cannot learn anything , you dont want to learn anything , more than that those who want to suggest anything to learn are "quacks" ... Others babble even with their acoustics studies ...

Who is pathetic? me or you ... I dont laugh but i can smile here ...😊

Now repeating a common place fact seems all you know and want to learn about what is "musical"...

Seriously? All you have done is to repeat yourself.

Your post dont need really an answer because it is mainly many insults for me no more mere misrereading , now that you recognize FINALLY without even saying it explicitly, that atmasphere argument about psychoacoustics use of second order harmonic distortion is useful, and that psychoacoustics define "musical" not taste

Oh my, but you are sensitive. Glass houses and pots who call kettles black. And what I said about Atmasphere’s answer was that at lleast it actually was an answer. I am good with "pertaining to music" what Mirriam Webster says about pleasing and harmonious and enjoyable.

you are pathetic ....you laughed but not me...I dont laugh at people by the way...

But I read your stuff and it is funny! I cannot help myself!

Enjoy your "musical" system because it seens only you know what is "musical" ,

That’s not true. You told everyone else that their perception/impression/definition of "more musical" was wrong and that you had the only concrete objective answer. But up until a few hours ago you would not produce that answer. I never said I was the only one who knows the answer. I said that I think the answer is subjective and the term means different things to different people. I derive pleasure and enjoyment from what my system does, and that is all I, personally, need. I only wanted to know, since you said that everyone else was wrong, what your definition of right was. It was like pulling teeth.

Who is pathetic? me or you ... I dont laugh but i can smile here ...😊

Glass houses and pots talking to kettles again. You should laugh . . . it’s good for you.