2. speakers
  3. 188463-1660

Finally...subwoofer that's aesthetically pleasing!

Saw these in a trade mag.

$750K for the set according to the article.

If one has the wallet for this kind of excess-HELL YEAH!

I personally think a pair of the old Stradivari would compliment the subs more than the Suprema towers. Perhaps not a sonic match, but that would only be a $20/30K goof-put those in the guest room.

I have to contact SF to see if they’ll sell another pair of subs for my SWARM setup.

dz0xNDAwJmg9MTM2NA==_src_75046-system-glosnikowy-sonus-faber-suprema-fot2.jpg (1400×1364)

Suprema Tech Specs | Sonus faber

 

tablejockey
james633
1,047 posts
 


the subs look nice, I would like to see a marketed external crossover from them  we could use a few more options.  

Sadly in the press release you could see the scan speak sticker on that midrange. Good brand but at ludicrous prices I expect them to be made of fairy dust.  

immatthewj
2,254 posts
 

Don’t you know, you can tune a piano but you can’t tune a fish!

A blast from the past I'd be okay with forgetting.

dekay's avatar
dekay
5,668 posts
 

Matt:

Is "I used to look like Cary Grant" more your tune?

 

DeKay

allenf1963
372 posts
 

I remember when I used to get nervous about discussing with my wife the desire to spend $1,000 for a new piece of stereo equipment. I’ve been married over 40 years, by the way. $1,000 was a lot of money for 23-year-old newlyweds.

 

When I sold my business and retired in 2017 my office building didn’t sell for $750,000. Good Lord....

immatthewj
2,254 posts
 

 

Is "I used to look like Cary Grant" more your tune?

Before all those pies?

I hate to say it, @dekay  , but the tune a piano/tune a fish thing induced a REO Speedwagon flashback, and I freaked out.  Thankfully the internet exists and I was brought back to my senses and after some cursory research I discovered that tune a fish does not necessarily apply to REO's tuna fish.  I am going to take some Thorazine now and go to bed.

More to discover