Finally...subwoofer that's aesthetically pleasing!
Saw these in a trade mag.
$750K for the set according to the article.
If one has the wallet for this kind of excess-HELL YEAH!
I personally think a pair of the old Stradivari would compliment the subs more than the Suprema towers. Perhaps not a sonic match, but that would only be a $20/30K goof-put those in the guest room.
I have to contact SF to see if they’ll sell another pair of subs for my SWARM setup.
Suprema Tech Specs | Sonus faber
I remember when I used to get nervous about discussing with my wife the desire to spend $1,000 for a new piece of stereo equipment. I’ve been married over 40 years, by the way. $1,000 was a lot of money for 23-year-old newlyweds.
When I sold my business and retired in 2017 my office building didn’t sell for $750,000. Good Lord.... |
Before all those pies? I hate to say it, @dekay , but the tune a piano/tune a fish thing induced a REO Speedwagon flashback, and I freaked out. Thankfully the internet exists and I was brought back to my senses and after some cursory research I discovered that tune a fish does not necessarily apply to REO's tuna fish. I am going to take some Thorazine now and go to bed. |
If you are buying anything close to the cost of these speakers, you probably have a dedicated audio room, so why would it matter what a subwoofer looked like? I’d probably have a stack of Rel’s if I had a larger audio room and the Rels would probably sound better than this single SF subwoofer at 1/2 the cost. Some of the better speakers have black only enclosures or I have only seen them in black: Magic, Raidho, Borressen, and others. |
