The only aesthetically pleasing sub is no sub at all or hidden in a wall, another room and ported completely out of sight. For most, a necessary eye sore.
Finally...subwoofer that's aesthetically pleasing!
Saw these in a trade mag.
$750K for the set according to the article.
If one has the wallet for this kind of excess-HELL YEAH!
I personally think a pair of the old Stradivari would compliment the subs more than the Suprema towers. Perhaps not a sonic match, but that would only be a $20/30K goof-put those in the guest room.
I have to contact SF to see if they’ll sell another pair of subs for my SWARM setup.
Suprema Tech Specs | Sonus faber
- ...
- 54 posts total
If someone has the dough for this type of extravagance, just commission Franco Serblin, the man behind SF and have him design a pair of your own Suprema's? For one thing, design a magnetic setup so as not to ruin the look with those cheap fasteners SF still uses. $1,000,000+ McIntosh & Sonus faber Suprema Loudspeaker System at CES 2024 (youtube.com) I also noticed SF has reintroduced the Stradivari. Not impressed with the new look?
I guess I admire Serblin SF than current SF. |
@bigwave1 Your's blend in nicely. Big wave? What's your home break? |
Jetter, not sure where I saw the driver with the sticker (another forum or YouTube), but I saved a screen shot of it. I am not sure how to post a picture from my phone on this forum. It does not really matter, lots of brands use scan speak, seas, SB Acoustics and get good results. Where I take issue is when the brand changes the phase plug or back plate and calls it their own design…
I thought it was more funny than anything in a $750k speaker. You get more tech in Vivid audio (just to name one brand) for 1/10th the price. Not that tech by itself makes things good, I still like good old paper drivers. |
- 54 posts total