I see no reason to store files. If the system that provides our music goes down, we'll have much larger problems.
Building your music digital music collection
Hello all, just looking for some pointers on how to go about building your own storage library of music which is better than digital streaming (tidal/qobuz). I guess it is the uncompressed wav files or maybe dsd where applicable. From what I understand Flac is compressed.
I am doing just streaming now, but I think having offline collection and room might be useful.
- ...
- 22 posts total
Yeah, I too question your premise that ripped music will sound better than uncompressed music from the likes of Qobuz and Tidal. And as @ghdprentice mentioned, and especially with Qobuz, you can get tons of music in hi res in addition to full 16/44.1 CD resolution. Personally I think building an offline library is a waste of time, but that’s me. |
I ripped my cd collection, other wise it’s LPs or stream from Q. @hilde45 what if Q goes down not the entire inter web? |
Building a music library makes sense if, 1) you own a large enough collection of rare CD’s that are sourced from analog masters and currently not available on Qobuz/Tidal. I own over 500 such albums, majority of them still not available on any streaming services and sounds much superior than streaming counterparts. |
I have hundreds of CDs I ripped and I’ve downloaded many files from Qobuz and HDTracks with the intention of doing just what you are planning. That quickly lost steam once I started to stream with Qobuz and Tidal. I now almost exclusively stream from those two services. There are titles I cannot find on either and I use my local files when I want to hear those. It’s so easy to go down rabbit holes on either service finding new music and listening for hours. I particularly like the related artists and albums both services provide. |
- 22 posts total