Subwoofer speed is in the room, not the box


First, if you like swarm, that’s fine, please start a thread somewhere else about how much you like swarm.

I want to talk about the impression that subs are fast or slow compared to planar or line sources.

The concern, and it’s correct, is that adding a subwoofer to say a Martin Logan or Magneplanar speaker will ruin the sound balance. That concern is absolutely a valid one and can happen with almost any speaker, not just speakers with tight dispersion control.

What usually happens is that the room, sub and main speakers aren’t integrating very well. Unfortunately for most audiophiles, it’s very hard to figure out exactly what is wrong without measurements or EQ capabilities in the subwoofer to help you.

So, there’s the myth of a small sub being "faster." It isn’t. It’s slower has worst distortion and lower output than a larger sub but what it does is it doesn’t go down deep enough to wake the dragons.

The biggest problems I’ve heard/seen have been excessively large peaks in the subwoofer range. Sometimes those peaks put out 20x more power into a room than the rest of the subwoofer. Think about that!! Your 1000 W sub is putting out 20,000 watts worth of power in some very narrow bands. Of course that will sound bad and muddied. The combination of sub and main speaker can also excessively accentuate the area where they meet, not to mention nulls.

A lot is made about nulls in the bass but honestly IMHO, those are the least of our worries. Of course too many of them can make the bass drop out, but in practicality is is the irregular bass response and the massive peaks that most prevent any good sub from functioning well in a room.

Bass traps are of course very useful tools to help tame peaks and nulls. They can enable EQ in ways you can’t do without it. If your main speakers are ported, plug them. Us the AM Acoustics room mode simulator to help you place your speakers and listening location.

Lastly, using a subwoofer to only fill in 20 Hz range is nonsense. Go big or go home. Use a sub at least at 60 Hz or higher. Use a single cap to create a high pass filter. Use EQ on the subwoofer at least. Get bass traps. Measure, for heaven’s sake measure and stop imagining you know a thing about your speaker or subwoofer’s response in the room because you don’t. Once that speaker arrives in the room it’s a completely different animal than it was in the showroom or in the spec sheet.

Lastly, if your room is excessively reflective, you don’t need a sub, you need more absorption. By lowering the mid-hi energy levels in a room the bass will appear like an old Spanish galleon at low tide.

erik_squires

@gdaddy1 

“Using my ears (crazy isn't it?) I concluded that if your main speakers produce good bass down to 50hz why restrict them? Why? Because it sounded better, fuller, more glorious. Plugging ports and making a sealed cabinet restricts cone movement. Makes the main speaker sound thin and anemic. IMO... if you want a sealed main speaker then it should be properly designed to work that way. Sealing ports and restricting quality speakers as an after thought is a mistake.”

 

I can rationalize that statement as I feel the same way. I was not sure if the original post is specific to home theater or two channel audio. 
 

My use of subs with my current speakers is only to exaggerate bass from old rock albums. Something like Back in the Saddle by Aerosmith or any glam rock bands of the 80s where double kick drum was predominant in the music. Def Leopard and Aldo Nova come to mind as well. During those sessions I rock out and am not really interested in the audiophile aspect per se, since the music is loud. When listing to more settled music such as jazz, or easy listening, say Eagles or Fleetwood Mac, I find myself turning the subs down or off..unless of course I want to feel that added bass because we are partying. 

I love the overall sound of my speakers as is, Classic Audio Field Coil Loudspeakers T. 1-5 Reference with 18” downward bass and 15” front mid bass, horn loaded with Fostex beryllium tweeter. 

I have been using the Velodyne SMS-1 bass EQ with great success to tackle optimization of 4 SVS 3000 13” subs..well, at my last room. My new room is much larger and I have a pair of 18” Rhtymicaudio subs coming soon for parties. Otherwise, I use the subs when I feel that I might  need extra bass which is occasionally and when experimenting. 

 

What Erik Squires mentioned about bass being omnipresent in way that feels as if it’s an event is usually realized when the subs are playing louder and providing that emphasis, or the main speakers have been castrated and a portion of the bass region output has been shifted to the subs. It’s definitely a feeling and sometimes more is more and maybe better. I just don’t see me adding another layer of crossover complexity to my straight audio chain since the designers of very capable speakers meant for their speakers to be driven with their designed crossovers to give the best sound for their speaker.,

 

I hate taking the time to see if this piece of music sounds better with that added feeling, when before, it sounded great as is, especially with big big extra large speakers that can play thunderously loud with pronounced bass depth when required. So, for me, bass augmentation is used sparingly. I am long past the crawl method, injuries  prevent that, but situating subs in good locations as a starting point and measuring away goes a long way. Check phase, and don’t be afraid to aim subs in directions that are not typical. Also, to add more complexity, what about Speaker Boundary Interference Response (SBIR)? This will surely come into play when setting up subwoofers. 

Using my ears (crazy isn’t it?) I concluded that if your main speakers produce good bass down to 50hz why restrict them? Why? Because it sounded better, fuller, more glorious. Plugging ports and making a sealed cabinet restricts cone movement. Makes the main speaker sound thin and anemic.

@audioquest4life

I think what you are missing from the original thesis is that how a speaker performs once placed in a room is very different from the measurements. Sometimes in good ways sometimes in terrible ways.

Your experiences are going to be very room dependent. In your room and with your speakers plugging those ports may sound "thin and anemic" which in another situation might sound less boomy and better balanced. I’ve heard from one A’goner that they found the perfect balance by plugging 1 speaker but not the other.

Nowhere do I universally suggest you should plug all main speakers, but that if you are adding a subwoofer it may be a good option to make it easier to integrate a subwoofer. What matters is the in-room bass response and which option causes fewer headaches to deal with in equalizing the entire system.

 

@audioquest4life  If subwoofers and main speakers are integrated correctly there is no reason to turn the subs up or down with any genre of music. A system that is tuned correctly does not care what genre you are playing. When I use the term , system I include the room in that category. 

Most audiophiles are ball parking it with their ears which are extremely poor calibration devices. There is no substitute for measurement.  

Good thread, I don’t have a lot to contribute that has not already been said. But I have been highpassing all my speakers with an active crossovers for about 10 years now. Every speakers has sounded better with a highpass of 60hz or higher. The improvement subs bring is staggering when done right. With a 24db slope on both ends 80hz is about a high as I can go before I “hear” my subs (probably need better subs to go higher). 70hz is the sweet spot with my current speaker location and 24db slope. It measures flat and sounds good, I do have pretty large capable speakers that handle 70hz and up just fine. 
 

I find it silly when people chase bigger and bigger speakers at sky high prices for better bass, but refuse to try an actively passed sub system. 
 

 

james633

820 posts

 

Good thread, I don’t have a lot to contribute that has not already been said.
 

... 
 

I find it silly when people chase bigger and bigger speakers at sky high prices for better bass, but refuse to try an actively passed sub system.

 

Same sentiment here. Perhaps not “silly” so much as unnecessarily complicated. 😅

I think the main crux of this topic is the cultural inertia that floor-standing speakers enjoy, as the overall concept predates active subwoofers, especially active subs implemented and EQ’ed as > 1 unit. The exact topics as covered in this (highly informative) thread seem rare convo’s among folks employing line arrays, since many (hifi) examples do not reach very far below 100 Hz (mids/high drivers). Sub crossovers below 80 Hz accordingly and quickly become irrelevant for such cases.