Geddes multiple subwoofer method - 3 subs vice 4


Geddes recommends 3 subs for optimal sound - a different perspective

 

Interesting video depicting Geddes philosophy on using subs. Also, he treats the main speakers as part of the bass solution and does not recommend using high pass filters as this takes away from the total bass capabilities of the entire speaker sub interface system. I am going to experiment this weekend. Also, a higher crossover frequency for the first sub collocated closer to the main speakers is new to me. Recommended above 100 hertz for the first sub and then incrementally lower for the 2nd and 3rd sub in an asymmetric pattern. 
 

I feel like the Geddes approach for sub integration closely resembles what I have been doing for years without even knowing this method. So, my 18” deep bass and 15” mid bass drivers on the field coil speakers become part of the solution instead of being taken out of the equation. That’s what I have been doing and that’s what I thought sounded best to me. Multiple ways to do sub integration but this method is the one that pretty mirrors how I have been doing it for years.

audioquest4life

Well I’m glad to see that several on this thread, including @audiokinesis are taking up the issue of distortion and dynamic range of the mains being something worth considering when adding subs. :)

Too often that behavior gets overlooked for one reason or another.

There is no right one way to setting up a subwoofer system, but there are some common denominators. The first is as @erik_squires described, a complete two way crossover is mandatory preferably digital because this is the only way to accurately time align the individual drivers. @james633 With a 64 bit floating point processor running at 24/192, DSP is totally invisible. There are only sonic advantages and no disadvantages as long as good DACs are being used.

The most important concept that Geddes advances is the use of multiple subs also championed by @audiokinesis. Two is the minimum, I use 4 as does audiokinesis.

@audioquest4life It is not the size of the woofer that counts, it is the frequency range it operates in. The higher a woofer goes the more important is the use of a high pass filter. Many large woofers are running up to 350 or even 500 Hz. This is well into the midrange. Middle C is 256 Hz. Bass under 100 Hz will cause doppler distortion of everything else carried by the driver. The is also no such thing as too much head room. You also have to use a filter if you plan on time aligning the drivers which IMHO is mandatory. 

Another important concept is running low bass with up to 20 dB of gain. This gives you the visceral character of a live performance. If done right it does not make the bass warm or boomy it just increases the vibratory sensation of the music. My favorite curve increases bass at 4-5 dB/oct from 100 Hz down. 20 Hz is hot by 10 dB. Some rooms may require more.

The room is key. I am very fortunate as my listening room was designed as such and there is no back wall. The room opens to the rest of the floor which is acting as one big diffusor. So in my situation I am listening just as much to the drivers as I am to the room whereas most people are listening more to the room. 

Another important factor that was mentioned was room treatments for bass do not work. It is a total waste of money which could have been spent on another subwoofer or a better crossover. 

@erik_squires I have no idea in this day and age why someone would use a ported loudspeaker. We have loads of powerful amplifiers and digital signal processing can give you any reasonable frequency response you require. Subwoofers in particular should always be sealed as port noise is ubiquitous with the amount of air moved by a subwoofer driver. The effect of lowering many types of distortion including IM, Harmonic and Doppler and increasing headroom is just as important as adding low bass when using subwoofers with two way crossovers. Good for you. Now try getting this into the heads of most subwoofer users who are being sold a bunch of malarkey by the manufacturers. 

Post removed 

I am going to dip my toes in a digital solution soon. I got rid of my JL subwoofers (with apologue high-pass) and ordered new subs (JTR RS1). This time around I am going to try the MiniDSP SHD for sub integration. Not sure the MiniDSP will be good enough for a long term solution for me (clean enough? Maybe?) but it will let me try different filters and what not (has its own PEQs, and Dirac too). If I like the solution I will try something more highend as money allows. The SHD is limited to two subs and I think I would like to try 4 at some point


My room is pretty large especially with the back doors open to other rooms. The room is effectively 42’ long and 26’ wide with everything open. So I don’t fight room nodes as much as others. I just like the slam of subs (no speaker can touch it) and want to digitally align them more or less.


I don’t see anyone using JTR stuff for music so it should be interesting (they have a trial period, -shipping). I just picked based on the measurements, impressive extension, overhead, and low group delay. For their measurements they were pretty “cheap”.