Positive review or negative reviews are unequal as for their meanings for me...
A piece of gear can be evaluated for his design quality but to be evaluated in some system context with a qualitative and a measured synergy level ( they are not the same for me) is another thing and an evaluation in some acoustical environment is also a third things completely ...
Measured confirmed specs of a piece of gear are not always enough to discard or promote a piece of gear in my opinion . It is only an element ..
I will not even indicate but cannot put it under the rug the importance of the reviewer not only his audio gear history but his acoustics experience and his own musical interests and biases .
A negative review may appear less ambiguous in meanings than a positive one but it is not the case generally ... Does the negative review refer to the design quality only of the gear piece or result from a bad synergy with other pieces of gear or a system ? Or does the negative review result more of some specific acoustic environment not optimal at all for it? Or from the reviewer biases ?
It is why giving negative reviews ask for more work , or more caution, or more parameters inspections before speaking ... And the consequences may be hard for an industry...
Reviewers know that...
😊
It is why i prefer statistical users and reviewers analysis... I bought my pieces of gear without ever listening to them before ... When i did my job of analysis i winned.
Save in a case where it was no synergy then i return the amplifier... 😁