What is to be gained by putting a digital recording on vinyl?
- ...
- 42 posts total
Most modern recordings are made digitally, these days. They're just made at much higher resolutions and bitrates than what comes out on CD (16/44) and various other download formats. Usually, the digital masters will use a resolution of at least 24-bit/96 kHz, sometimes going as high as 32-bit/192 kHz. At these resolutions the music will sound just as good (if not better) than a pure analogue source. To me, vinyl always sound better than CD and I think this is at least partially why. |
@ossicle2brain " At these resolutions the music will sound just as good (if not better) than a pure analogue source." I agree with what you say about the quality of today's digital recordings. They are very good. Pretty much all of the vinyl I own comes from the 50's, 60's, 70's, all analog chain. My question remains, why put these new digitally recorded pieces on a slab of vinyl? I look forward to your thoughts.
|
Over the past few years of improvements in digital recording, I have been recording both analog- and digital-sourced LPs to DSD128 and become less of an analog purist.. I almost always prefer a vinyl-to-hi-res digital recording over a pure digital stream. If a digital recording intermediated by vinyl sounds better than a pure digital stream, is this not proof that however euphonic, vinyl is an affectation? Of course RTR playback from an analog source is a different question, . |
- 42 posts total