As a classical music lover, I too would take issue with the notion that it's "just the same music played over and over by different ensembles." This is no more true of classical music than it is of any other genre. It's rather like saying, "I've heard Jazz at the Pawnshop so who needs Louis Armstrong or Johnny Hodges?" While it's certainly true that there are many fine classical performances available in excellent sound, as you point out, it's also true that some soloists, conductors and orchestras bring qualities to the music that others don't. Zoltan Kocsis' Rachmaninov 3rd is very nice. Horowitz and Ormandy playing the same music are positively electric and unforgettable. Both are in nice sound, but it would be a grave mistake to put both performances in the same category on that basis alone.
Does it have to sound good for you to like it?
I listen mainly to classical music. The SQ of classical recordings is all over the place, not nearly as consistent other types of music. Recording large orchestras is a complicated and difficult endeavor. Smaller ensembles are easier to record. So, if you listen to a great performance of an orchestral (or any) recording but have trouble with the sound will you avoid listening to it?
- ...
- 117 posts total
- 117 posts total