I’m confused. Please explain.

For me, the benefit of listening to live acoustic music is to familiarize yourself with what natural unmiked acoustic instruments sound like. Piano, guitar, voice, violin, cello, trumpet, sax, clarinet, etc. That can help you recognize the subtle nuance of a recorded acoustic instrument when it sounds right. Symphonic music can also help you pick up on the subtle ambient sounds of a concert hall, and natural dynamics.

Electronic and miked instruments can sound like whatever electronics they’re being played through, which makes for a less natural and less reliable reference.  It's pretty common, and frankly fairly easy to get a system to sound like a dance club, but much harder to get one to sound like natural music.

In the end, to each his own and we should setup our systems to our own liking, but I definitely find it useful to know what a natural instrument sounds like when evaluating a system.

@ghdprentice, @ knotscott. 
Thank you for the great responses ! It’s great to get the perspectives of the more experienced members here to expand my knowledge. 

Everyone wants their amplified music to sound like unamplified music.

There is nothing wrong with picking what sounds good to you, regardless of how that sound matches live acoustic instruments.  All systems sound quite different from live acoustic music and even if we seek to most faithfully reproduce live music, we can arrive at radically different sounding systems depending on our priorities on what qualities are most important.  That is why “accuracy” and “fidelity to live music” are useless criteria; we have different goals and priorities in attaining that sound.

It helps to hear a lot to develop your own personal preferences.  It is easy to get drawn off the right path by something flashy that briefly excites but soon gets tiring so one should do a lot of listening to learn about your own “sound.”

When it comes to popular music, I hardly think fidelity to the live concert experience is the goal; I would junk my system if it sounded that bad.

  "If one chooses audio equipment by what sounds good at the moment you can end up on a wild goose chase."

ghdprentice,  What an inappropriate statement to make.  Nothing Ronboco said should lead anyone to say what you said:  "But, as you choose components that way, your system can start sounding flashy and soulless…"  Go look at Ronboco's system and room and get back to us.

Ronboco,  based on the room and equipment you are using, I bet it sounds great.  If it sounds good to you as well, then don't worry about what others' goals are.  You ask a very good question: "Are you saying studio music can somehow be made to sound like symphony instruments?"  That's a good question for a recording engineer.  I bet George Martin, recording wizard for the Beatles, or the genious Brian Wilson would give you a very quick no.  You have no trouble identifying the voices or the instruments in these recordings and they more than likely sound better than their live performances of the same music.  I would venture to say that if you are satisfied with what you hear listening to various genres of recorded music on your system, it would approximate very closely an unamplified live music event.  Don't we all know what a human voice or a piano or a crashing cymbal should sound like?