Step Up Transformers….Are they Worth the Trouble?

"Richness of Tone" is a term I use, that I have experienced being perceived, depending on device used, rhat has variance in how the presence is substantiated.

I like to detect a presence, but it will need to be subtle to get my vote. 

Another may find that a much more weighty and what ai class as ovetbearing is to be detected to get their vote.

Another may class any detection of a Richness of Tone from a add on device, as being iadding a unnecessary noise. Where they. 

would prefer to add a Richness of Tone through considering other options.

What really matters, where an End Sound is being sought by an individual, that is unique to the individuals preferences, is that the different perceptions that are able to be created, are experienced and that the individual makes their choice for what is most attractive and wanting to be maintained. 

Dear @lewm  : " I don’t think you can fairly make a case for SUT over high gain phono on the basis of simplicity. A high gain stage may consist of one gain device at the input of what otherwise is an MM stage. No extra ICs, no outboard chassis, much shorter connections. "

I agree with you and the problem is that exist to many tube owners and ( with all respect ) a high technical ignorance levels ( manufacturers know that but they are doing the bussiness. Taking advantage of the $$$$$ market. ) along that several of us in reality can't appreciate the real MUSIC and almost all go for what they like no matter what even that if what they are listen it is wrong against the active high gain stage. These problems makes that gentlemans as mulveling and all the ones in this thread are happy with SUTs. Even they don't try to help the OP and they do not like to analize the whole subject in objective/subjective equilibrium.

After my post where I mentioned the facts about what the OP want to do no one of these SUT advocates gentlemans makes any single comment: dead silence and I can infere from that that they has to arguments against all those facts other that our famous: " I like it " that is a end of a dialogue. Really pity but such is audio life.

@lalitk   Grado Epoch.

R.

@rauliruegas 

?  Didn’t realize we were in a competition, lol!  But if so, I’m sticking with Andrew Rothwell’s view - choose whichever you like best.  They each have their advantages (and disadvantages).

@lalitk   : " given my investment in Carts (north of $10K),  "

Then do it a favor and don't " walk " with back steps. Don't lost MUSIC information and don't add more signal degradations that your beloved cartridges pick-up during its very hard/tremendous effort on LP playback.

R.

@mulveling

Appreciate your feedback based on your extensive experience. I am also leaning towards Tube MM phono + SUT. With a SS system, if one place I can possibly insert a tube component; this would be IT. I am trying to line up few auditions and let’s see which pairing of phono + SUT I end up preferring.

@herman ..EMIA is on my list :-)

Those advocating simplicity or short signal path, I have already experienced that in my previous analog setup. I may end up adopting a phono that does it all in a single chassis but not until I tryout a MM phono + SUT pairing in my system.