Step Up Transformers….Are they Worth the Trouble?


Some of you may aware of my Garrard 301 project, it’s now very close to completion. The plinth finally shipped from Hungry after 3 months of long wait.

Given my last experience with Hana Umami Red, I would like to take things to the next level. Which brings me to mating low output cart with a SUT. Every review I’ve read so far suggests when the SUT-MC match is right, the end result is heavenly. The bass is right, the midrange is clear, and most importantly, the highs are relaxed and extended—not rolled off.

I am not saying you can’t get great sound without a SUT but it appears with a properly matched SUT, sound can be quite magical.

Thought this would be the right time to get input from experienced users here since I am still contemplating my cartridge and outboard phonostage options.

My preference would be to go with a tube phono…I kinda miss tinkering with tubes :-)

My system, Garrard 301 (fully refurbished), Reed 3P tonearm, Accuphase E-650 with built-in AD50 analog board ➡️ Tannoy Canterbury’s.

Cart and phono under consideration through my dealer,

Fuuga - Output : 0.35 mVrms | Impedance : 2.5 Ω (1kHz)

Phonostage - Tron Convergence and Konus Audio Phono Series 1000

The cart - MC combination, I am lusting after is Etsuro Urushi Bordeaux MC with their Etsuro Transformer.
https://www.etsurojapan.com/product/bordeaux

The other transformer is EMIA, cooper or silver version.

Your input is appreciated!

128x128lalitk

@mdalton 

Thanks for the heads up. I may pick up the Sculpture copper version if I end up with Fuuga and Bordeaux carts 🤣 

 

@lewm  : As you know I owned 3 original MC2000, yes I like it. All came directly from Ortofon to me in México ( no distributor in my country. ).

In those times no one not even reviewers looks at the stylus/cantilever joint under microscope so I can't attest on it. One of those samplezs made a trip to VDH for boron cantilever and it ouperformed the other two.

Now, i still ownthe MC20MK2 that's a model that appeared before the 2000, it has aluminum cantilever and loking with my microscope it came glued and I still own the 3000MK2 model that was in the market after the 2000 and comes too with aluminum cantilever and the stylus is glued.

Next is the only picture that I can get from the net but I think we can't be sure if its press fitted or glued:

3523866-a44425b6-mega-rare-cartridge-ortofon-mc2000-and-t2000-with-boxes.jpg (1100×824) (canuckaudiomart.com)

 

Due to the other Ortofon cartridges samples I have on hand seems to me a little weird that the 2000 was not glued.

 

@kennyc   the PS audio is at high end market niche almost inexpensive unit that's a true challenge to other SS very top units with a price tag over 50K ( this was what reported M.Fremer. ).

In the other side and with all respect to him I think that not only you but no audiophile can take really seriously a gentleman  like @lalitk  that  ( as he said/posted )  had not direct experience with SUT and who told you: 

"  I would encourage you to try SUT. "  @lalitk  this truly creates " confussion " and not  the facts I posted and that you said creates " that ".

 

R.

 

 

R.

Personally I like a head amp/phono stage with LOMC  over a SUT. A good gain stage to me sounds better then a SUT. A good analogy would be an active preamp compared to a passive preamp.  Both can be great under the right build quality and situation.  But for me the active is more engaging. 

@glennewdick 

What are some of the brands that are offering good head amp/phono stage. My Google search did not show any good results. Thank you! 

@lalitk 

Just for one, not particularly expensive example, I believe the MC dude of their phono stages are active gain designs.  Interestingly though, they just announce a new, separate SUT - the Argentum.  Haven’t seen any reviews yet, but very interesting - silver wound but not crazy expensive.  They are a very interesting company, handled by a bunch of dealers I think highly of.