Looking for comparisons between CD transports


I'm still a disc-spinner, having a pretty large collection of CDs across a range of genres, though mostly classical. About 2 years ago I bought an Audiolab CDT6000 and lived with it for about a month before deciding it wasn't my cup of tea and selling it off. While its clarity and soundstage were impressive, there wasn't sufficient heft to the music, and it seemed to favor the music's component parts rather than portraying a cohesive whole. 

I'm considering the Audiolab 9000, the Schiit Urd, and possibly the Primare DD15. That's the budget range I'm comfortable with. (Despite the glowing reviews, Jay's Audio is kind of out or range for me at this point).  I'd be grateful to hear opinions on how these transports stack up against each other from those of you who have heard one or more of them. It will be running through a Sonnet Morpheus DAC, if that info is helpful. Thanks!

 

 

cooper52

Here’s an update: I looked at the various alternatives and from what people have said in various reviews and to keep the budget under control, I’ve added the Shanling ET3 to the system. There was a really good deal offered by their online store so I took the plunge. Took a while to get here (about 3 weeks, but hey, I’m patient) and it’s now going through its paces in my system. Right away, I’m hearing a significant improvement over my previous player (the above-mentioned Cambridge Audio CXU), and I’m hoping that with further hours of break-in time things will improve even further.

It’s connected to my Sonnet Morpheus DAC via AES/EBU (from Audio-Art Cable) because that’s the DAC’s only available input--the rest are all spoken for by various components. Of course, right out of the box, things did not sound particularly good, but over the next few hours that initial thinness and harshness moderated quite a bit though there’s still, perhaps, a way to go before it finds its voice--I’ve only put about 8 hours on it so far. We’ll see.

This transport imparts a sound that is plenty detailed but definitely fuller and more unified than the Audiolab CDT6000 that I used to own. I’m hearing the music as a whole event, not parsed into individual instruments, but the little details are definitely all there. There is also a sense of spaciousness in the presentation, definitely wider and deeper than my other player(s). 

The ET3 offers an option to upconvert from 44.1 kHz to 192 kHz or to several DSD densities (the Morpheus doesn’t do DSD, so that wasn’t an option for me) but I didn’t think the upconversion to 192kHz added anything compelling to the sound. It may be slightly sharper, but it’s also brighter and perhaps a bit more shrill.

One or two things that I’m less happy with: the transport has trouble reading some discs, possibly because its error correction (if any--not sure here) is less robust than some other players. This may be because the designers didn’t want to add any more processing than absolutely necessary, though this is just a theory. I tried one disc in my collection that plays fine in every other player I’ve tried, but the ET3 simply refused to read. Another of my favorite discs exhibited clicks and dropout on certain tracks, a problem I haven’t experienced before. Everything else I’ve tried seemed to work just fine.

This transport can also play from USB sources, and I did try that out. Getting the feature set up turned out to be quite an adventure, though. There’s an app you can add to your phone (Eddict Music Player) from which you can access and control the information on the flash drive, but you have to follow Shanling’s detailed instructions carefully go get it to work. Not for the tech-averse, this process. In the end, I still preferred the sound of the actual CD to that of the USB drive.

So far I’m pretty happy with this transport despite the problems I’ve detailed above.. Definitely intend to live with it for a good while. Then we’ll see whether stepping up the upgrade ladder becomes a temptation. (Believe me, I did give a LOT of thought to investing in the Jay’s Audio machine but just couldn’t justify the price, at least, not yet).

Hope you’ll find this info useful.

 

Thanks !  I am loving it.    Major step forward from a universal player as a transport.   Wish I did it a while back but life, kids, college, etc kept budget in check.   I did have one dedicated transport years ago, it was an Audio Alchemy based on a Sony CD drive.  It sounded good but didn't live very long.   

It's the closest I'll get to an Esoteric and there's a lot of trickle down technology in there.   Hopefully it'll be my last player for a long time.  

I just installed a 701t to go with the T+A Dac 200. Kills my streaming setup which I thought was pretty good. Black background. Tone and definition. As oddiofyl mentioned this is a a leap from the Oppo 103 that I had “tried out” with the Dac 200.  
I really don’t have anything to compare it to in its price range but pretty damn happy. I do find myself listening to much more of the cd vs skipping around while streaming. Only on the 3rd day but it’s been on repeat for 48 hrs. Loving it so far!!