Open baffle speakers
Open baffle speakers design is the simplest , to get bass response similar to other design , like ported, the baffle size must be huge to avoid low frequency degradations . Tipical size the baffle width 10-20" got weak bass performance. I am wondering how open baffle speakers design became so popular ?
- ...
- 164 posts total
@ozzy62 I owned the Spatial Audio X5 speakers a few years ago and loved them, but I didn’t like the built-in active subwoofers and they sounded thin in the midrange and bass. The X5’s were nice, but they were kind of bright until they made some adjustments and added a resistor to tame the AMT tweeter. I was going to buy the Spatial Audio X4, but changed my mine and went back to a box speaker. I still love OB speakers. I think we chatted briefly on AudiogoN or Audio Circle back when you had the X3’s. How do your Qualio IQ speakers compare to the X3’s you owned?
|
This is information to all OB speakers fans. If you dont believe in acoustic silence and only trust what you are hearing , stop reading my post and keep enjoy in bass performance open baffle design . But if you have open mind -Baffle size must be bigger than length assume low frequency wave , For usually size baffle 20-30 " OB speakers bass performance starting from approx. 100-120 Hz https://www.acousticfields.com/wavelengths-in-our-rooms/
|
The thing I didn’t like about the X3 was Clayton’s decision to use a 12” driver to reproduce the midrange. I never got the feeling that the midrange reproduction seemed “real”. There was no texture to voices and instruments. Dynamics were good and the bass depth and quality was excellent. I kept them about a year and moved them on. It’s been a while, so hard to compare. The midrange performance of the IQs is definitely top notch. The powered 15” drivers on the X3 might get the nod, but not by much. |
@ozzy62 I know exactly what you mean concerning the midrange sound of the Spatials. I’d like to hear the Qualio IQ speakers one day. Thanks! |
- 164 posts total