First impressions of new MH-DA006, Musetec flagship

Just posted initial review of Laiv Harmony/Denafrips Gaia combo, 006 bested on virtually every parameter. I doubt 006 performance via usb likely to change much with burn in at a little over 300 hours. This means 006 would have to be advantaged by using it with Gaia via I2S, slave to Gaia clock or use internal clock?

Harmony/Gaia more natural or analog like presentation alongside all the audiophile sound qualities we look for, sorry, hands down loss for 006. Really quite surprised by this, I was very willing to accept present 006 sound quality  as a 'long term' reference. To have it so easily bested by Harmony combo is one of those rare eye opening experiences, I don't experience this kind of domination much anymore, usually far more subtle differences at this level of equipment.

I'm still reserving final judgment, however, 006 partnered with Gaia via I2S could be the magic bullet?

Where is the review?

I will be interested in your impressions of the Gaia with the 006 via i2S.

I'm still loving my 005 and feed it through i2S.

As I wrote earlier I am also enjoying my 005. With a couple of new components in the system, I am finding it has yet more to give. Knowng the designer, and the reviewer here, as I do, I am certain the 006 is a good step up.

But I write now about the I2S into the 005, and possibly into the 006 (or other DACs). And it’s easier with the 006 as it has pin-out selectivity, not available in the 005.

I have been a sceptic of the DDC kind of approach taking the USB to I2S conversion out of the 005 (or 006) into a stand alone unit, For I think that implimentation is very well done internally by Musetec. I have always thought that a network player taking you from ethernet directly to I2S had to be the answer, bypassing any use of USB or SP/DIF for that matter. But for me an appropriate unit, without a Swiss Army Knife approach, was hard to find. But with a new device having pin-out selectivity from Iancanada I found that at a very reasonable price I’m achieving a performance level that I thought was far more expensive than I was willing to pay. And I’m only beginning--using what I would call the company’s mid-level combo and a $2 HDMI cable. I used to think this was the direction to go, and I have now proven it to myself. And there are actually several ways I can upgrade this initial set-up. And so on to a new adventure.

@melm  Can you explain in more detail what you are experimenting with. It sounds interesting. Are you building a network bridge/streamer that converts an ethernet signal to I2S?

What I wrote about is a duplication of what is demonstrated here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tc_QfRTbb6U&t=1113s

But without the screen. This is very easily put together. I first built something far more modest to test the quality of the Iancanada stuff. These are very high quality boards and can run up in price. The more modest experiment had sp/dif (which is closely related to I2S) and was at least equal to my much more expensive ethernet in-USB out network player to which was attached an expensive power supply. It also had I2S out which I couldn’t use with the oo5.

One can go quite a bit further than the first video. Of course the boards are not pretty; some people build cases for them. I’ll probably build a wooden box to throw over it when I’m done.

Iancanada is Ian Jin. Word is that he is a designer of computer medical equipment and this is his hobby.