Do speakers need to be re-broken in?


Just purchased a set of speakers which have sat for quite while- 5 years from what I am told. I have heard the differences between new "tight" speakers drivers and a broken in pair, where the bass gets deeper and the speaker "breathes" better and sounds more open, and clear and resolves better, you know- just sounds better all-around.

I haven’t witnessed this personally in my own home in over a decade, and that was with planar drivers and not conventional cones, which this set has, but regardless of speaker technology I believe it is well understood this is a necessary process and manufacturers agree and suggest this- so not looking for any arguments there please.

But I would think used, or already broken in speakers would not do go through this process, but my ears are telling me they are getting better, so contrary to my assumption perhaps they do need re-breaking in? Anyone else gone through this?

128x128mclinnguy

Like so many things audio, my best guess is that anybody who tries to definitively answer this question "yes" or "no" really has no idea.

I can say from personal experience that speaker break-in does exist. But I can’t define with any credibilty the scope of products or technologies that it applies to.

In my case, my Audeze LCD-3 and LCD-XC headphones both sounded horrible when I first got them. In particular, the Beatles "Come Together" had such bloated bass that I couldn’t stand to listen to it. In both cases, cycling white noise and looped music through them for a week fixed the problem. After the break-in, both had that exquisite Audeze low end, fast, detailed, and extending effortlessly down into the 20Hz region. Far too dramatic a change to be dismissed as "ears acclimating" (really!) or (if I hear this BS one more time, I’ll scream) "confirmation bias."

Then, a few years later, I came into possession of that same pair of LCD-3s, which had not been used in over 6 months by their current owner. The fat bass was back and when compared to my LCD-XCs, was exactly the way I’d remembered it. I literally could not listen to them playing most music.

But after another week of break-in and the two units sounded pretty similar again in the lower registers.

Anybody who kneejerks about this happening because I ’wanted’ it to occur is merely displaying their own confirmation bias. The difference was repeatable, and was so profound that it would be impossible to imagine -- even if I hadn’t A-B’d the two units before & after the second LCD-3 break-in. To put things into perspective, the difference was on the order of turning an old-time receiver’s bass or treble tone control knob from 1 to 10. Real, significant, and repeatable.

One last note: After owning the XCs for a while, I had the drivers updated by the factory to a newer design. When they came back -- you guessed it -- big, fat, painfully bloated low end. Another break-in and problem solved.

To sum it up: Audeze planar magnetics, at least the models I owned, undoubtedly require break-in in order to be listenable. Furthermore, leaving them unused (at least the LCD-3) for a long time created the need for another break-in period.

I have no idea why this was the case, although there are plenty of credible explanations. But it was the case.  It wasn't in my head.

I caution against trying to extrapolate my experience to other types of components, to other planar transducers, or even to other Audeze planar-magnetic phones. All I can say is that audiophile break-in, in my experience, is inarguably real in at least some very popular components.

 

Then, a few years later, I came into possession of that same pair of LCD-3s, which had not been used in over 6 months by their current owner. The fat bass was back and when compared to my LCD-XCs, was exactly the way I’d remembered it. I literally could not listen to them playing most music.

But after another week of break-in and the two units sounded pretty similar again in the lower registers.

To sum it up: Audeze planar magnetics, at least the models I owned, undoubtedly require break-in in order to be listenable. Furthermore, leaving them unused (at least the LCD-3) for a long time created the need for another break-in period.

Aha!, thanks for sharing @cundare2 

How do you separate your perception from your expectations? 

So if expect there not to be an improvement from break in, then you won't hear it.
Got it.

All the best,
Nonoise

Having sat dormant for 5 years, they do need re-break in, if only for a short while - meaning, likely just a few hours, if that much.

This is a popular myth that is provided by the speaker industry so that if you bring your speakers home and don't like them, they can explain it away that they are not yet broken in.  A few weeks later your ears forget how good your old speakers sound and presto!  No return is required!  If they really simply needed break-in - don't you think the manufacturers would do this process before shipping!  We are so gullible............