Current or Previous Harbeth Owners…


For those of us that have had or currently have, are there other speakers you’ve listened to that you found sounded “better”?  I’m eyeing stepping into a set of 40.2 or 40.3’s, but am also willing to step in a different direction.  I realize “better” is subjective, but a speaker that does what Harbeth does, but better.  

I have a set of Pass Labs XA100.5’s, FWIW.

toddcowles

Have I heard speakers that impressed me enough to consider a possible replacement for  my M30.2 XD’s?

Yes and No …. Let me explain

NO: Nada at its speaker current pricepoint nor even if you double it and a bit more,…..

YES ….. but only at significant multiples in speaker price-point step-up AND (a fine and important distinction …) a stablemate many multiples price step-up for the rest of the upstream audio system electronics . (My system is in the $40k - $50K range ) 

I do not know your Harbeths, but become increasingly convinced there is so much to improve upon in front of any transducer in the way of not only equipment, but power conditioning and cabling.  My transducers (3 years now) continue to improve markedly as power cables and interconnects break in.

I've invested considerably in equipment stand, floor stander platforms, wall outlet and of course room treatment.  I believe many of us go down the rabbit hole chasing ghosts.  Those Harbeths being quite good may well have not reached full potential with what's in front of them.  Or, I could be wrong.  Cheers

Back in the 1990's I owned a pair of Harbeth HLP3ES bookshelf speakers with a matching pair of Harbeth passive subwoofers. Did not care for the subwoofers but I did like the HLP3ES, which was a very pleasant sounding speaker.  I do, however, prefer the sound of my 1980's KEF Reference Series 101 bookshelf speakers, which I find to be more involving.  I also owned a few pairs of Rogers LS3/5A's, another lovely British bookshelf speaker, as well as an original version of the Linn Kan. The KEF 101's still sound best to me.  

I have owned Super HL5 Plus, and currently have Compact 7-ES3 30th Anniversary and P3ESR SE.  A good friend had the 40.2 and sold them.  I was baffled when he did, they were amazing.

There's always something "better", but at their price point, Harbeths are hard to beat.  It's going to come down to what you prefer. 

I replaced the Super HL5 Plus with KEF Reference 1.  The KEFs are a little more detailed and dynamic, without being bright.  With a little more laid back electronics, I may have liked the Harbeths better.  I have also owned Stirling LS 3/6, which are very similar to the Super HL5 and were close to, but not quite as good as the Super HL5. 

Even though they are a "lower" model than the Super HL5, I liked the Compact 7-ES3 30th Anniversary even more.  They seemed more cohesive and had less tendency to be bright.  

The P3ESR are amazing, but really made for a small room or near field listening.  I absolutely love mine and while I never say never about swapping out any component, it's unlikely they will ever leave.

The 40.2 are simply amazing - the tone, timbre, and texture of the music along with their ability to fill a room make them really special.  Imaging is great and they can create a very large soundstage.