Some thoughts on dust covers


Over the course of time there have been many discussions concerning the subject of dust covers.  They tend to revolve around the central question:  Should the dust cover be down or up while playing records?  Some of these discussions have been nasty, consequently I have refrained from participation.  It is hoped that I can provide some common sense that was given to me by someone of unquestioned authority many years ago.  During college and after, from 1970 to ~1980 I worked in HiFi retail, selling high end lines of audio equipment.  One of these lines was Thorens.  Sometime around 1977 or 1978, if memory serves, Thorens introduced their new TD126, as a top of the line TT with their own arm and I sold the first one at our store to very good customer.  He came back very unhappy after the first night of frustration with it.  The problem was that with the dust cover closed some of his favorite records were hitting tangentally on the very back were the platter came closest to the dust cover when it was in the closed position.  I called the manufacturer's rep and he set up a three cornered phone call with himself, the Chief Engineer of Thorens at the time, and me.  I don't recall the man's name, but it doesn't matter, it is what he said that matters, then and now.  The Chief Engineer explained that the problem was caused because the hole in the offending records was slightly off center so there was an eccentricity as such a record rotates about the spindle.  The solution was simplicity itself, the dust cover should be removed always when playing records.  That the intent of the cover is to protect the turntable when not in use.  I pointed out that we lived in a semi-arrid environment (San Diego, CA) which is dusty to which he replied that if the environment was too dusty for records it should also be considered unhealthy for people to be breathing the air.  He recommended are filtration, not dust covers to address environmental concerns.  The rep asked about air bourne feedback from speakers and the Thorens guy laughed and said that if that was a problem in a given system, relying of the dust cover was a very flimsy and ineffective solution and that proper measures should be instituted to provide meaningful distance and isolation to ameliorate the problem.   So the often offered extremes:  a) Always play your records with the dust cover down, or b) put the dust cover away in it's box and never use it, should both be recognized for what they are are - not solutions at all.  First principles:  Identify the problem(s), seek solutions and alternatives, prioritize.

billstevenson

wonderful to learn the word, a bit more from AI (numbers didn’t copy properly)

AI Overview

Learn more

Names of large numbers and their scientific notation

An undecillion is a number that is written as 1 followed by 36 zeros in the United States and 66 zeros in Great Britain. It is a very large number, so it is not used often.

Explanation

  • In the United States, an undecillion is written as

    10 to the 36th power

.

  • In Great Britain, an undecillion is written as

    10 to the 66th power

.

  • Undecillion is used in the study of atoms, computing, and internet infrastructure.
  • It is also used figuratively to describe a large unknown amount.

Examples

  • The ratio of electric force to gravitational force between two protons is roughly equal to one undecillion.
  • The maximum number of IP addresses that can be contained in internet protocol version 6 (IPv6) is around 340 undecillion.
  • In 2024, a Russian news outlet stated that the total sum of legal claims against Google in Russia was 2 undecillion rubles.

 

Sadly, undecillion hadn’t been approved during my clinical training years. Then I went into the lab and never came out.

Dust is not the problem. It’s dust mites. They eat your albums and eventually if the numbers grow….they eat you.