Looking for a Replacement for AT VM740ML Cartridge

@richardbrand 

I think the Shibata sounded 'fatter,' closer to an elliptical like a 2M Blue I had.  Never tried the ML.

I upgraded right after to a OC9XSL and thought it sounded thin by comparison.

I never thought the SH lacked in highs though.

This was back when I was running a Darlington Labs MP-7.

@richardbrand

On the VM540 ML, I used the recommended weight in the owners manual, not sure on the Shure, I will have to check. I will get back to you on that, I’m not home at the moment. My Shure does have the brush. Add a half gram extra if brush is in the down position. If it is locked in the up position, you don’t need to Add any extra weight.

@stereo5 

Thanks, I am ok for the Shure tracking weight, but the VM540ML is about twice as much (excluding the extra for the Shure brush).  The VM540ML is over the standard adjustment range for my 'SME 3009 S2 improved with fixed head shell', which I can extend using a tracking force gauge, and also over the anti-skating range for which I have no answer except a heavier anti-skating weight.

@theflattire 

I would have thought the progression in detail (high frequency resolution) would increase with stylus shape from round to elliptical to Shibata to micro-line, simply because they fit progressively better into the groove.

Many people might prefer a smoother sound with less high frequency, which shoul translate into less transient attack.  I have switched from a Shure V15 type III with elliptical stylus to the AT540ML with its micro-line stylus.  To my ears it probably is a bit more detailed but without two tone arms or a detachable head shell, I am relying on my memory!

One day I might buy a Jico micro-line stylus for the Shure ... but the entire AT540ML was cheaper!

Tape a nickel to your headshell. Readjust your cartridge settings again. Anti skate, tracking force whatnot. See if it makes it better or worse.