This post gets at a real value for both A'gon and ASR -- objectivity:
Unlike other reviewer outlets, ASR isn't heavily supported by advertising like most of the audio print media. They have posted unfavorable reviews of generally successful if not popular products and have given good reviews for little known and inexpensive new products.
Avoiding marketing and forum hype is a good thing. ASR does it their way. Some do it on A'gon with their own experiences or counterarguments.
These two posts get at a problem with over-enthusiasm about "measurement" and the religious fervor of some at ASR:
I'm unhappy that they are most likely steering newer audiophiles down the measurement rabbit hole, when they don't even have a clue yet what type of speakers and equipment they personally enjoy.
The decades of going into audio stores in my region and listening to a wide array of systems is something I cherish to this day. Going to listen to other peoples systems, all great learning experiences.
Both comments point to the fact that an overweening reliance on measurement tends to keep people from experience as critical to learning to listen. Trusting one's ability to take time to listen, notice, feel, and connect with music is the key to good audio, and when rankings and measurements displace that, we bind ourselves to a technocracy that shoves experience (and value) aside. This doesn't mean that measurement cannot help experience, only that it needs to be watched as carefully as an open flame.