Disagreements and Conflicts between Audiophiles have we lost our brotherhood and maturity?
I looked back over my posts and even my audio business dealings over the last 5 years and it seems like we have lost our ability to peacefully disagree or resolve disputes like grown men. Some of my best friends in this life are audiophiles and I enjoy the gear, the music and the brotherhood. I don’t enjoy the senseless spats. The inability to resolve conflicts and the people trying to destroy peoples business and reputations. Thoughts?
In the past I said many unpleasant things about Audiogon policies in this respect. And though my opinion did not change - the older I get the crazier I become - I stopped that because certain people and consequentially their ways of organizing, including business endeavours, are limited by their genetics and upbringing. Not their fault, but I find it upsetting and they probably don't. So, yes, DNA lottery, this is an interesting phrase but it can also be a terrifying thought. |
@jayctoy it was great meeting you. Glad you liked our system. We received a lot of compliments today. I do this as a passion. I practice law as my profession. But this hobby is my obsession. I tell people that our gear and cables are special. I’m glad you got to confirm that today. Thanks. |
My two sense: Audiophile debates reveal layers of human psychology and social dynamics that extend far beyond mere equipment preferences. At their most basic level, audiophile arguments often revolve around picayune details—minute differences in sound signatures that imperceptible to most listeners. The intensity with which these small differences are debated reflects how humans naturally form identity through specialization and differentiation. Today’s algorithmic element is striking amplify these divisions. Audio forums and social media create engagement through disagreement, with recommendation engines serving increasingly polarized content about tube vs. solid state amplifiers or digital vs. analog sources. Even though audiogon does not have these engines, we are all now conditioned. Class dynamics are particularly evident in audiophilia. High-end audio has long functioned as a luxury status marker, with price points that explicitly segregate participants by economic class. The tension between "objective" measurements and "subjective" listening experiences often maps onto economic divides—those who can afford $10,000 speaker cables defending their value against measurement-focused critics. These conflicts mirror larger cultural patterns where taste itself functions as cultural capital. Pierre Bourdieu's concept of distinction explains how aesthetic preferences signal social position. Audiophilia exemplifies this by creating elaborate hierarchies of "refined" listening that separate the "initiated" from "casual" listeners. What makes audiophile debates fascinating - if that is not too generous a term - is that they're simultaneously about genuine technical differences, social identity formation, economic status display, and the human tendency to form passionate tribes around shared interests, be it a religion, a political party, or a celebrity. They're microcosms of larger societal tensions played out through discussions of soundstage width and frequency response. |
