Like sns, I also had an SU 6 and now have a Gaia 12th. There is no comparison in my system. The SU 6 was disappointing and was outperformed by usb, but the Gaia brings something special to the table.
- ...
- 18 posts total
I have owned the SU-1 KTE, the SU-2, and the SU-6. All did a great job. I now own a Gaia 12th, it seems like a higher tier than any of those. I'm not sure why one might need an I2S input though. If your streamer already puts out I2S, why not go straight to the DAC that way? Unless it isn't compatible or something. |
I said, "...outperforms the Gaia...in terms of electrical noise and jitter," as shown below. I did not mean sonically. It's actually good that the Gaia still holds an edge sonically. The SU-6 was endorsed by several reviewers, including Hans, and I don't expect it to be a level below. Thanks for the feedback. Jitter(rms) Electrical(rms) Jitter(peak) Electrical(peak) Holo Red 73ps 2.97mV 213ps 12.9mV Singxer SU-6 75ps 3.3mV 225ps 13.7mV Singxer SU-2 KTE 85ps 3.2mV 247ps 13mV Denafrips Gaia 86ps 5.2mV 243ps 20.7mV Gustard U18 453ps 5.2mV 1133ps 22mV |
@996turbo911 Your omitting the most important advantage of using a quality ddc which is the I2S clock and power supply to the clock, and don't forget optimization of whatever input chosen. I very much doubt any streamer with I2S output has an equivalent clock, power supply to that in a quality ddc. If one is going to all the bother of using I2S they should ensure it's implementation, meaning clock and power supply is superior to master clock in dac. In other words one should hear sound quality improvement using ddc clock vs dac internal clock, this means syncing to ddc clock. |
- 18 posts total