Is bi amping worth it ?


New thinking ? 
 

the subwoofer world is quite confusing . so I have  left that decision alone for a bit.  I have recently read where bi amping the khorns could give me the little more bass punch I am looking for. ?    The 601 mono-blocks certainly have enough power but I have a tube pre amp C-2300 that does not separate bass and treble signals so would need to add an external crossover.  
 

anyone have any experience with this ? Is this worth the effort ?  And if so any recommendations on the external crossover ? 
 

thanks again everyone. I greatly appreciate all input from this forum.  

hardhattg

@billpete 

Hi other Bill

I was just pointing out that if two identical stereo amplifiers are used, one channel of each amp could drive the woofers and the other channel could drive the mids and highs.  Configured in this way each speaker could have it's dedicated stereo amplifier positioned near the speaker.  And, it would be a lighter load on the amp's power supply than if both channels were driving woofers.

The comment about shorter cables is mostly esthetics.  Personally, differing speaker cable lengths don't bother me.

Bill 

@wbs

I'm having trouble wrapping my head around that. In stereo, wouldn't this mean that I have one channel driving the bass and the other channel driving the mids/highs? Isn't this kind of defeating "stereo"?

Interesting thought about the length of cable. I know that electrons flow at the speed of light (at least I think they do) so maybe it would be impossible to actually "hear" a difference in minimal length differences. I was more thinking of there being ever so slight differences in the resistance which maybe could affect it in some miniscule way. With all these tweaks, we start splitting hairs and claims of perceived differences become a source of much speculation some outrageous discussion. As long as I like it more than before is really all that matters to me and I do read a lot here for the opinions of the fine folks here who have a helluva lot more money tied up in a system than I could ever hope to have. 

@billpete 

I’m having trouble wrapping my head around that. In stereo, wouldn’t this mean that I have one channel driving the bass and the other channel driving the mids/highs? Isn’t this kind of defeating "stereo"?

No.  "Stereo" is in the source, then gets split to be amplified by right and left channels.  You still have distinct left and right channels in the system.   It might be easier to think of them as two separate 2 channel amps rather than two stereo amps.  

Knotscott said it pretty well.  A stereo amplifier is two one-channel amplifiers in one chassis which happen to share one power supply (usually).  There is an input and an output for each channel.  Really not different than setting two monoblocks next to each other.

The stereo part comes from the left and right outputs from your preamp.  If you use two sets of outputs from the preamp you have two lefts and two rights and as long as you don't mix them up they are still stereo.

Bill 

 

@hardhattg,

My advice: sell the MC 601’s and buy the MC451 1-Channel Dual Mono Amplifier.

That said, passive or active bi-amping should not be undertaken without first asking the speaker manufacturer’s advice. Hope that helps. 😎

@erik_squires +10

Mike