Berkeley DAC Series 1, anything better 2.5K$


Hey guys,

I am about to plunge for a used Berkeley DAC Alpha Series 1 that will set me back by $2200.

I have heard it in comparison with Benchmark and there is no comparison. I did A/B test it with the Series 2, but did not think the difference was worth paying 3000$ extra.

However before taking the plunge I was wondering if there are any other DACs < 2.5K that might beat the Series 1 (its pretty old).

There are so many DACs and so little time so thought someone hear might be able to help. Am I making a big mistake overlooking the new kids on the block (QuteHD or Yamamoto) that might outperform the venerable Berkeley Alpha Series 1.

Looking forward to hearing your opinions.
essrand
it would be useful for those who connote that one dac is superior to another to state the reasons for their statements.

this is a problem for many threads, in which component comparisons are made.

most statements are anecdotal and unless a thorough explication of stated opinions, little use to potential purchasers of equipment.

it is impossible to know what is best at a price point, unless one has auditioned all components at that price point and conducted a valid comparison of the components.
Its been 20 days with the NAD M51.

Its awesome (only if you connect directly to the amp).

When I connected the NAD to my preamp (Triode TRX-1), I preferred (very slightly) the Triode DAC (TRV-DAC 1.0SE) that costs $2500, due to some tube mid-range sweetness.

It maybe that my pre-amp is still not completely burnt-in.
It could also be the cabling: since I have Stager silver from DAC to Pre-amp , but JIB acoustics copper from DAC to Amp. When comparing the two.
Essrand,
Which ultimately do you prefer, the NAD direct or the Triode DAC-preamp route if you can only have one?
Charles1dad, am still trying to figure it out. Will report back soon after more listening.

I love this hobby. At the end of all your "troubles" you are listening to music!