Benefit of Tri or Quad Wire compared to Bi wire


My speakers are four way and have fourteen bananas (7 red and 7 black) on the back. There are three sets of jumpers. I am about to purchase new speaker cable. Has anyone tried tri wire or quad wire? According to Robert Harley - you should at least bi wire when you have the terminals to do so. I am assuming there is diminishing return when you go to three or four cables. Please write your experience of tri or quad wiring, preferably compared to bi wire or single wire. Thanks, as always.
dcaudio

Quad-wired? I saw only 4 speaker terminals on the N800s I had making bi-wiring the maximum possible.

Bi-amped and quad-wired? Seems more than compulsive.

Kal
My personal experience is there may be some benefit separating the LF from the MF/HF, but beyond that I would upgrade to a higher quality cable before buying more of a lower quality cable, given the same amount of money to work with. That is what I did with my tri-wired Alon's which ended up sounding better with a better quality bi-wire pair and jumpers. Keep in mind there are a lot of influencing factors including the added capacitance resulting from more wire. Therefore, each case can be different.
Kr4,

As I stated, mine are the big 800's, not the N800.

The benefit of actively biamping with quad wiring of the 800's is not a subtle improvement! The active biamping, with the Krell KBX, was the biggest single impovement that I have ever made to my system.

Know before thy speak. :)

Richard
PS> I know of one guy that had his 800's set up as I do. Before selling them he bought the N800S. He compared the two in his own home and sold the N800S.
Well, I did miss your reference to "big B&W800's" but I also tried to Google them and could find no references. Can you provide one?

Kal
Kal, check the archives at Stereophile, I think Richard is referring to the B&W 800s that Lewis Lipnick had and reviewed back in the 90s?