Anti Cables to join my system, are they enough?

That´s true, so far.

Tgrisham, that's correct I still keep my PS1 around. The difference is though, I don't go around telling people that PS1 sounds better than any $$$ CD players.

Anticables are well worth the money and surpassed many higher priced cables that I was using in my system. I finally have stopped the cable search (for now) and am very happy with them. The only drawback that I have found is they take a long time to burn in (if you believe in burn in). I think the folks that are disappointed are the ones that wind up selling them because they didn't allow enough time to pass. I kid you not when I say that my Anticables took about 400-500 hours to reach their optimum.

This pains me but I agree with Stanwal.

I had a used pair here for about 2 weeks and tried them in 3 different systems.

Generally they are lean, without body, and lack detail when used in very high resolving systems.

Now to appease all the flame throwers, not that I care, they are an extrememly high value product. The QPR is virtually unmatched.

IMO

I wonder if nearly pure copper wire, of any kind, is close to the standard of electrical transmission from amplifier to speaker given that most speakers use copper internally from binding post to driver. Any other form of electrical transmission is designed to change the impedance, capacitance or resistance and therefore alter the sound to suit the arrangement of amplifier and speaker interface. If so, then the choice of speaker wire is more a function of amplifier and speaker interaction to suit a particular taste than a purely electrical phenomenon. Is this an accurate interpretation of the interaction?