Lacee....
First, there is a little thing called libel
- it's easy for a company to extol the virtues of their product, even without "proof" (many do), but much harder for someone to refute their claims. Word of mouth is one thing, putting it in writing on a forum - whole different kettle of fish!
Second - if people were to report their failures this forum would be immense
- and very tough to seperate wheat from chaff :-)
Third, people just may not wnat anyone to know about their failures.
- in fear of the rebukes they "might" receive in return.
As you well know - the effectiveness of a component/cable/tweak/etc is relative to the system/components it was "auditioned with".
My atrategy in considering reported products is to do some "due diligence" and revue the system the poster is using (if available) in order to understand why the claim might be valid.
After all a $30,000 speaker cable might not prove "as effective" if I have a $20 interconnect from the phono stage to the amp.
Conversly - nay-sayers should understand that a $30,000 speaker cable on a $200k system might just be the cat's meow! Just pop into your local Audiophile Store for a test drive :-)
From that perspective, I prefer to see reports only on the positive, then I can extrapolate from only those experiences together with available data.
So, we are left with an imperfect, but workable method of communicating our findings.
Without forums like this the thousands of products and a vast wealth of knowledge pertaining to this hobby would be lost to the majority of us
Your words are not lost on the readers - I'm sure they resonate with many, and there's always someone willing to challenge :-)
You keep on posting - we'll keep on reading:-)
For all the avid snake oilers of the new inquisition, I have seldom seen any mention of what products to stay away from.
What companies to avoid.
And most importantly what products "they have tried"that proved to be snake oil.
First, there is a little thing called libel
- it's easy for a company to extol the virtues of their product, even without "proof" (many do), but much harder for someone to refute their claims. Word of mouth is one thing, putting it in writing on a forum - whole different kettle of fish!
Second - if people were to report their failures this forum would be immense
- and very tough to seperate wheat from chaff :-)
Third, people just may not wnat anyone to know about their failures.
- in fear of the rebukes they "might" receive in return.
As you well know - the effectiveness of a component/cable/tweak/etc is relative to the system/components it was "auditioned with".
My atrategy in considering reported products is to do some "due diligence" and revue the system the poster is using (if available) in order to understand why the claim might be valid.
After all a $30,000 speaker cable might not prove "as effective" if I have a $20 interconnect from the phono stage to the amp.
Conversly - nay-sayers should understand that a $30,000 speaker cable on a $200k system might just be the cat's meow! Just pop into your local Audiophile Store for a test drive :-)
From that perspective, I prefer to see reports only on the positive, then I can extrapolate from only those experiences together with available data.
So, we are left with an imperfect, but workable method of communicating our findings.
Without forums like this the thousands of products and a vast wealth of knowledge pertaining to this hobby would be lost to the majority of us
Your words are not lost on the readers - I'm sure they resonate with many, and there's always someone willing to challenge :-)
You keep on posting - we'll keep on reading:-)