How many would be surprised?


We generally cannot see the actual wire used in our IC’s because of some sort of covering. I recently acquired an XLO Ref 2 balanced IC and these have a clear outer cover exposing the wires inside. Maybe XLO is unique, but the wires used are tiny. With the overall size of the cable you develop a preconceived idea of how big the “cable” is inside the cover.

My JPS SC2 speaker wire can also be seen through its cover, it is quite beefy.

I wonder how many would be surprised to see the actual wire inside their cables?
brianmgrarcom
For that matter, Nordost also uses tiny conductors in its flatline series -- which includes the bang for the buck (;)) Valhalla.

I wonder: is it *more* expensive to manufacture micro vs. larger gauge wire?
Heavier guage cable does not cost more to make. Since copper and silver are not really expensive materials.

IMHO, tiny guage cables tend to preserve the music signal better than larger guage cables. I use Audio Note Silver Speaker cables and they are about 18 ga or thinner. I was sceptical at first about the bass but guess what???? Bass was the deepest, quick, without BOOM and clarity without harsh and shrill. Beats cables 10 times the thickness.

One other thing about thinner cables....there is more finesse in the music too compared to the thicker cables.
Heavier guage cable does not cost more to make. Since copper and silver are not really expensive materials.

IMHO, tiny guage cables tend to preserve the music signal better than larger guage cables. I use Audio Note Silver Speaker cables and they are about 16 ga or thinner. I was sceptical at first about the bass but guess what???? Bass was the deepest, quick, without BOOM and clarity without harsh and shrill. Beats cables 10 times the thickness.

One other thing about thinner cables....there is more finesse in the music too compared to the thicker cables.
Hi Genesis. With the edit feature, you could have deleted your last post. I did the same thing recently.