Anyone own Innersound Speakers?


Are they as awesome as I am reading? Can anyone give a direct comparison between ML? Particularly the Eros MKII...the integrated amp/x-over is interesting.
mdomnick
I have to agree with what Audiokinesis has said but would like to add a couple of thoughts. I have owned both the original Eros, and now, the latest version of the Mk-II. In my view, the latest Mk-II integrated preamp/active crossover/bass amp is a huge asset to the system. It provides 600 Watts per channel to drive each 10" woofer, along with a quality active crossover, as well as manual and remote control of volume, and bass to midrange contour. It has separate low bass and upper-bass/lower midrange controls, so it is possible to achieve a very good balance in the majority of listening rooms. You can easily adjust the volume plus the bass and midrange balance on the fly from your listening seat for any recording you play.

The unit now handles up to 10.5 volts of input signal before overloading. This will let you run in almost any source without fear of overloading the input stage. Best of all, this current version is exceedingly transparent and allows your associated equipment perform to its maximum capability. To me, this is a huge advantage over the comparably priced ML offerings. If you only use one sound source, you don't even need a preamp -- just run it straight into the crossover amp and sit back and enjoy.

Even the universal learning remote is cool -- so far I have programmed it to operate my Parasound CD transport and 4 other components (receiver, VCR, DVD & TV) in my Home Theater system. Not only is the sound quality of the Eros Mk-II system among the best available, its user-friendly features are very easy to appreciate.
I heard the Innersound speakers at the Stereophile show last month. They sounded amazing. They have a very open 3 dimentional sound and the bass was really good. The person above, said they use a 10 inch woofer. The ones i heard, used an 8 inch woofer.
I have owned a pair of ISIS and a pair of EROS for a few years. While the sweet spot may be narrow, as it will be for any ESL's, it is plenty big enough for two :-)

The transmission line design gives the speakers much better bass response/accuracy than any ML's that I have auditioned (which is just about all of them).

You won't find a nicer, more knowledgeable person to deal with Roger Sanders. I have seen this theme from every owner that I have ever seen write about their experience with Innersound. Great support and service!

Little known facts - Did you know that Roger Sanders invented the curved ESL panel?
I own a pair of Eroses, and they are nothing short of fantastic!!! I auditioned a pair of ML Quests and while the midrange and treble were close, the Innersound bass response is superior to the ML. The reason is the crossover amp, and the transmission line design. It is a 10" woofer as measured from the outside edge of the cone. 8" on the inside. THe bass is tight, deep and LOUD. You won't be disappointed.

While the sweet spot is on the smaller side -- intentional per the deisgn -- once you have them setup properly, the sound, imaging, clarity, accuracy and soundstage in the sweetspot are absolutely amazing.

Roger Sanders is a very personable and knowledgeable designer. He is very helpful on the phone, and his advice is very down to earth.

I can't think of a better speaker bargain out there. These speakers are highly recommended.
Some one please remind Mdom about the importance of proper amp for electros. I've heard the midsize ML's hooked up to a big Krell and they sounded great, except the bass was not too good. Then i heard the ML Ascents at a friends house hooked up to Conrad Johnson tube mono blocks. Played classical and R&R, horrible! I think Innersound has a at home trial basis thing. That's probably best. Shipping will be expensive, but worth it. It'll cost about $150 UPS to ship back.