Artk-logically why would the loss matter in the room when I was using smaller speakers before?
That doesn't make sense to me....at all.
I may be wrong but I think Opalchip was really on the money with his assessment.
Perhaps the speakers have run in a little but I'm no longer hearing the differences I remember-the mid-bass and bass thump no longer seems as strong.....I do believe as Opalchip predicted my brain has adjusted.
However putting the 150's back in will be interesting and I may do that once I've lived with the 2.5's a tad more.
At this stage my gut reaction is that the 2.5's are better than the 150's-scale and detail but perhaps (and that is just a perhaps) that they haven't quite lived up to my expectations.
That doesn't make sense to me....at all.
I may be wrong but I think Opalchip was really on the money with his assessment.
Perhaps the speakers have run in a little but I'm no longer hearing the differences I remember-the mid-bass and bass thump no longer seems as strong.....I do believe as Opalchip predicted my brain has adjusted.
However putting the 150's back in will be interesting and I may do that once I've lived with the 2.5's a tad more.
At this stage my gut reaction is that the 2.5's are better than the 150's-scale and detail but perhaps (and that is just a perhaps) that they haven't quite lived up to my expectations.