"You suggested that my equipment must be the exception to the rule regarding Atmasphere as a friends Atmasphere components work fine. From a statistical or logical level that suggestion does not compute."
Tubes 108 your comment above that Charles's impressions based on his friend's ownership of Atma-sphere components, "work fine" and your situation may be "the exception to the rule" and you disagree from "a statistical or logical level that suggestion does not compute"
Why is it not logical or does not compute? Could you reference the date of the Sterophile review and the date of your particular situation, it might help in giving perspective to your charges. It seems you had a problem but by your last comment (the last paragraph of your last post) you seem to have an ax to grind. Why aren't you addressing your issues on this thread directly to Ralph after his response? After all it is he, not Charles that you should be responding to WITH some details and dates. Continuing with comments through a a 3rd party is questionable.
This product has been around for a while. Maybe in their early days they had quality control issues and they didn't address those issues in the manner that a new owner might expect, I don't know. All I'm suggesting is that there is not a complete picture of your grievance and you seem very bitter towards this company but you provide scant information for the reader to conclude that your information is totally credible.
Tubes 108 your comment above that Charles's impressions based on his friend's ownership of Atma-sphere components, "work fine" and your situation may be "the exception to the rule" and you disagree from "a statistical or logical level that suggestion does not compute"
Why is it not logical or does not compute? Could you reference the date of the Sterophile review and the date of your particular situation, it might help in giving perspective to your charges. It seems you had a problem but by your last comment (the last paragraph of your last post) you seem to have an ax to grind. Why aren't you addressing your issues on this thread directly to Ralph after his response? After all it is he, not Charles that you should be responding to WITH some details and dates. Continuing with comments through a a 3rd party is questionable.
This product has been around for a while. Maybe in their early days they had quality control issues and they didn't address those issues in the manner that a new owner might expect, I don't know. All I'm suggesting is that there is not a complete picture of your grievance and you seem very bitter towards this company but you provide scant information for the reader to conclude that your information is totally credible.