Does the VPI Aries1 best the VPI Classic1?

I have an Aries 1 Extended with an original JMW-12 arm. I've heard the Classic and Classic 3. Heard all of them with the same kind of cartridge - AT-OC9/II.

IMO, the Aries definitely keeps up with the Classic tables.

To my ear, the Aries is more detailed because it provides a better sense of soundstage and venue. Those are subtle details that are dug out better on the Aries. I do get a slightly better sense of upper midrange texture with the Classics but it is much more subtle than the soundstage differences.

I think any evaluation of the Aries must take into consideration all the different variations to that platform. The big plinth of the Extended version vs. standard size, the multitude of different platters that are available, motor configurations, SDS vs. Variac vs. wall outlet, arms, arm wiring, belts... All can have an impact on reproduction quality.

But for me, the bottom line is that the Aries Extended with a JMW-12 arm is my last turntable. I have no compelling reason to change.

Yes, direct comparisons. I've compared Aries, Aries 3, and Classic 1. In the same system with the same carts. Aries 1 and 3 easily beat the Classic 1 in every category. I concluded that the more sturdy acrylic plinth and the non-aluminum platters (TNT and Acrylic) were the main reasons.

I have the Aries 1, and I found no reason to change to other VPI products, especially since the increase in cost never produces the 'better sound' that I would expect. Let us all be honest, Harry is a profit making machine and he does so by reinventing the 'wheel' every two years. A marketing genius he is.

The Classic aluminum platter is a step up