Lightspeed Attenuator - Best Preamp Ever?


The question is a bit rhetorical. No preamp is the best ever, and much depends on system context. I am starting this thread beacuase there is a lot of info on this preamp in a Music First Audio Passive...thread, an Slagle AVC Modules...thread and wanted to be sure that information on this amazing product did not get lost in those threads.

I suspect that many folks may give this preamp a try at $450, direct from Australia, so I thought it would be good for current owners and future owners to have a place to describe their experience with this preamp.

It is a passive preamp that uses light LEDs, rather than mechanical contacts, to alter resistance and thereby attenuation of the source signal. It has been extremely hot in the DIY community, since the maker of this preamp provided gernerously provided information on how to make one. The trick is that while there are few parts, getting it done right, the matching of the parts is time consuming and tricky, and to boot, most of use would solder our fingers together if we tried. At $450, don't bother. It is cased in a small chassis that is fully shielded alloy, it gets it's RF sink earth via the interconnects. Vibration doesn't come into it as there is nothing to get vibrated as it's passive, even the active led's are immune as they are gas element, no filaments. The feet I attach are soft silicon/sorbethane compound anyway just in case.

This is not audio jewelry with bling, but solidly made and there is little room (if any) for audionervosa or tweaking.

So is this the best preamp ever? It might be if you have a single source (though you could use a switch box), your source is 2v or higher, your IC from pre-amp to amp is less than 2m to keep capaitance low, your amp is 5kohm input or higher (most any tube amp), and your amp is relatively sensitive (1v input sensitivity or lower v would be just right). In other words, within a passive friendly system (you do have to give this some thought), this is the finest passive preamp I have ever heard, and I have has many ranging form resistor-based to TVCs and AVCs.

In my system, with my equipment, I think it is the best I have heard passive or active, but I lean towards prefering preamp neutrality and transparency, without loosing musicality, dynamics, or the handling of low bass and highs.

If you own one, what are your impressions versus anything you have heard?

Is it the best ever? I suspect for some it may be, and to say that for a $450 product makes it stupidgood.
pubul57
Does the LS improve with the battery option? Curious what you folks have found? Not sure why it would, but thought I would ask.
I wouldn't say the battery option improves the sound, but there is something different about the sound when using the battery power supply. I just can't put my finger on it. I go back and forth between the two.
I just saw the Warspeed thread on AC and was mildly curious. They could not provide any details on "why" it was better, and it simply seemed like a me-too product. The name even tells you as much. From the listening tests mentioned earlier in this thread, the battery seems to have no sonic consequences.

IMO, George deserves all the credit for this development. It is his intellectual perseverance that has made it possible, and any "new" developments are to be viewed with a jaundiced eye.

Happy listening....
I would also like to hear other opinions about this from owners.
This is what I found, I have Lithium Ion batteries I use, and no one, even "golden ears" who visit can reliably detect the difference between them and the standard mains supply that comes with the production Lightspeed Attenuator, and this is on a very high rez system.
Even Sam Tellig "golden ears from Stereophile" said the same, as he bought the Lithium Ion batteries as well for his Lightspeed thinking they had to be better (pure dc and all) than the regulated mains but no he said if there is a difference it's miniscule and not detectable.

Cheers George