2. amps-preamps
  3. 1280360449

How does Aragon 24k/2004 stack up to modern equip?

I just picked up an Aragon 24k preamp/Aragon 2004 amp for a good price. I put them in my system where my Cambridge Audio Azur 840a resided and I must say I am VERY impressed. These are my first separates that I've owned, the speakers are JM Lab Cobalt 807's, speaker cables are Monster M1 mkII, and mains power cable is Straightwire Blue Thunder. Interconnects are MIT MI-330 series II. Like I said I love the sound, just wondering how these components stack up, and if anyone has cabling suggestions?
svtguy
rrog
1,958 posts
 
I feel the need to clarify something here. It is true Dan D'Agostino was involved in designing Aragon, but Aragon should not be confused with high end products such as Krell and Levinson from the same time period. Aragon is an inferior product and has more in common with NAD than Krell.
tpreaves's avatar
tpreaves
2,686 posts
 
07-28-10: Corazon
"How does Aragon 24k/2004 stack up to modern equip?"
"and I must say I am VERY impressed"

I think you answered your own question. As long as you are happy, that is what counts.

Best,

Dave
Corazon

Ditto!!!!
jaybo
4,478 posts
 
aragon holds its own with many more expensive products.
thesoundhouse
250 posts
 
I have heard Aragon sound better than Krell and I have heard Krell sound better than Aragon in many systems. It is model dependant and synergy between the speakers and the amps. I like the older Krell amps better than the newer ones. Simple sounds better. The newer krell is to complicated and it does not have lower noise floors you would expect from a modern amplifiers.
phd
1,320 posts
 
There is nothing wrong with Aragon, very good products that have stood the test of time for reliability and performance that exceeds their going prices. Recommending interconnects is hit and miss, trying different ones is the only way to get the desired sound you are seeking with your associated components, speakers, and your unique room acoustics.
More to discover