OPamps still inferior to discrete circuits?


Do the current OPamps sound good? Are they comparable to the best "discrete OPamp" designs? If you have two identical DAC's. One DAC has world's best OPamps and the other DAC has a state of the art discrete analog section: which will sound better? Of course: the unit with the OPamps will be (much) cheaper than the one with the discrete analog section, but that's another discussion.

Chris
dazzdax
My limited experience with the OPA627 is indeed a bit laid back sound. It sounds clean and "transparent", but altogether it doesn't sound very engaging in the long term. I think a discrete layout (a well designed one of course) would give more harmonic richness/complexity to the sound.

Chris
Chris - It might "give more harmonic richness/complexity" if you already have rest of the system that you are happy with. I need to spend money on speakers.

Audio always has been neglected an there is only a handful of opamps designed specifically for the audio. Even one mentioned by Undertow (AD843) as great sounding wasn't designed for the audio (no mention of it or any THD data) but rather as fast settling amp to use as buffer for A/D converters or peak capture or sample/hold circuits.


I am afraid that such advances like SACD come to us only because they have absolute copy protection and not for the sound.
Dgarretson, sorry for the late reply.
If you read more about the ASR Emmiter II Exclusive Battery amp, you will find out that its preamp sections runs on high-current batteries heavily bypassed with high-quality capacitors. This amp has 3 extra PS boxes that weigh about 100 pounds.
The Burson discrete opamps and the original OPA627 opamps were compared with the same (close to perfect) power supply.
Specs are just specs...trust your ears. I have trusted mine and do not regret it.
For a discussion on discrete opamps and their superior sound as compared to chip opamps, start here:
http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/ampins/discrete/discrop.htm
then take a look at (and listen to samples of) the state of the art opamps used by recording studios that care:
http://www.thelisteningsessions.com/session9.htm
best regards
There are advantages of both. Discrete circuits can be made for some special characteristics (such as very high voltage or lowest possible noise for some given source impedance), or customized with features that just don't have enough of a market to interest IC designers.

But there are some things that can be done in integrated circuits that just can't be done in fully discrete circuits, such as extremely high inherent transistor matching and highest possible thermal coupling between devices that need to track to work right.
So far in opamps the best I have seen for audio is made by Dan Kennedy:

www.diyfactory.com/data/Great_River_Opamp2.pdf

It is built up from discreet components.