B&W N805 vs. Revel M20

Good point, about associated equipment. I have a very toasty system (for SS that is--YBA Passion,Audio Aero Prima )and the M20s work beautifully. What can I say? They work for me. I love 'em.
peace,
warren

Hello S7horton,

I have owned both the Revel M20 and the Dynaudio 1.3MkII. I also extensively auditioned the N805 and my findings are as follows: I was in love with the N805, the detail and high end resolution was a marvel. But the same things that Elevick said about them, "The 805s sound simply sweet, open and lively out of the box!" are the things that I ended up finding irritating, because that quality never seems to mellow with break in, and caused me to look elsewhere. I then purchased the Revel M20 and found them to have more mid range detail then the N805 and better high-end extension. But, alas, to me, the forwardness of the sound and the very same high-end extension began to grate on me and made me feel fatigued. I even tried a different amp, from the Krell KAV-500 to the Plinius SA-250 MkIV, to try and tame the forwardness and slight brightness but to no avail. I then moved to the Dynaudio 1.3MkII and I thought I was in heaven. The high end was extended but very smooth. The mids were broad and deep with excellent detail and space between the instruments and vocals. The bass was adequate but, then again, they are monitors. Matched up with a good sub, they should be fine. I was sure that I had found the speaker for me. Then I end up at a friend’s house that is a distributor. He introduces me to the Jean Marie Reynaud Trentes. I was aghast, the detail, that far out performed my Dyns, was incredible. The soundstage was tremendous and there was so much bass, I was searching for the sub. I still had my doubts, because the associated equipment included a tube pre amp. I let my friend know that I did not feel that these speakers would do the same in my system with my processor. He proceeded to pack them up and give them to me for a weekend home demo. To my astonishment, they sounded just as good in my system as they did in his. Everything was there, from the huge soundstage and extremely sweet highs to the astonishing detail and the room shaking bass. If I could have I would have never bought them back and I plan on purchasing them as soon as finances allow. So, There it is, my personal progression through this impressive group of speakers. Of course, what I find impressive, others will find ho-hum and visa versa. Also, associated equipment has a lot to do with how one or the other speaker will perform as well as room dimensions and furnishings, so please, keep that in mind. I hope this helps. Happy hunting and good luck......John

I've heard both on a Levenson system. Why pay the price of the M20s and have to spend 200 hours breaking them in? If you have tube gear, think of the cost let alone the time. For that reason alone, I like the 805-that is an unbiased, general opinion that can not be argued with. Even Revel tells you to break them in.

The 805s sound simply sweet, open and lively out of the box! Yes, the Revels are nice after break in but by then you have a hell of an ear ache.

I prefer the neutrality and softer tweeter of the M20

I did a comparison of the B&W N805 and the Revel M20 at Marvin Electronics in Fort Worth, Texas. I found the M20s to be on the "cold and analytical" side of neutral.

I own the N805s and my primary (and only) complaint is that I feel that they could (and should) throw a larger sondstage - they sound like point sources. However, since my listening environment isn't ideal to begin with, this currently doesn't bother me. Match the N805s with a REL Strata III and you'll be a happy camper.

I also listened to the M20s at a dealer in Richardson, Texas. Even with different back-end hardware, I felt the same way.

To be fair, in both circumstances, I don't feel the M20s were adequately broken in at either location.

I own the 805's and found the Signature 805 to be a big improvement. It sounds like a much bigger speaker and had more of everything, bass weight, detail, soundstage, transparency, lack of boxiness...
Haven't heard the Revel's though.

I powered the M20s along with center and surrounds with a CJ
MF5600, which is not heavy on power and got plenty out of them. I also used the Proceed amp2/3 and had more than enough power.I would want 100wpc+ into 8ohms.

Nanderson, I too am very interested in the signature 805. They changed everything as compared to the 805, they just look similar. Out of my price range though. I'm curious how many of you chose the M20 have noticed they are power hogs. The 805 don't seem to be, and when I heard the M20's, they were powered by a Levinson 383. Not terribly shy on power. I don't really want to have to change amplifiers if I go with the M20's. Thanks.

I have compared both. (there are threads galore on this. check the archives) I went with the M20s. This was an easy decsion. They, for my ears, were better in almost every way. Do not go with their stands, though. They (the 805s, too) are poor and will have only a deleterious affect on your music. Read, (in the archives, too) my review of the Sistrum Mini Monitor support system. Have your M20s (or 805s, or Dynaudio 1.3s) sit on top of those babies and you'll freak. Trust your ears. I liked the M20s better than the Dynaudio 1.3s. Some like the 1.3s. Go with what makes your tympanics tingle. Good luck.

Not to throw a fly in the ointment but has anyone made this comparison to the B&W Signature N805 with better drivers and other modifications? Very interested in any thoughts on the newest upgraded N805s.

I auditioned both and preferred the M20. It seemed to have superior treble and very impressive midbass.

Hey Tim! You were right. There was a thread with my exact title. I usually mention to people to check the archives, and I didn't do that myself. Seems like I should take my own advice. I'll keep ya updated.

I have heard both and purchased the M20. Fantastice monitor for the money.

Seth- How's it going! I have heard the 805's but not the M20's, I have friend who is a big monitor guy and he preffered the Dynaudio Contour 1.3 over both of your choices and recently upgraded to the Jean Marie Reynaud(sp?) trenta and is in audio heaven. I liked the 805's when I heard them but I am not a monitor guy so they weren't for me. I believe there has been a few threads on this not too long ago, try a search you'll get a lot of input that way.
Cheers and keep us posted as to what you end up doing.